Proven fact Vs. Theory and modern science Vs. scripture (part I evolution)

I’m not here to say that science is bad or wrong,I’m full believer in proven science but science itself will be the first to admitt much of science is theory at this point.

We will talk about the difference between proven and known and theory.

So they have a theory that apes through evolution became fully human in maybe Uganda,Kenya or Tanzania about an estimated 2.5 to 7 million years ago and then dispersed from there.This theory in fine but there is no archaeological evidence of any civilization in those areas.Even if many people disbursed from there why would not some have not stayed ,Sub-Saharan Africa had everything people needed for a good life ,why no large civilization there.Is it possible that drought or some other disaster made this area uninhabitable and so people left,maybe but we don’t know that for sure.One would kind of think that if human life found it’s evolution somplace that at least some bread crumbs would be left at the scene of the crime.But where are the bread crumbs?

Where are the bread crumbs??

The oldeast known discovered evidence of human civilization are:Catalhoyuk,Gobekli Tepe,Boncuklu Tarla (not far from Gobekli Tepe)and Nevali Cori to name a few.All these sites are in modern Turkiye or Turkey ,where Noah’s ark is said in Genesis is to have landed.Also there is the discovery of Boncuklu Tarla in Mardin in eastern modern day Turkiye ,also very close the Noachian ark landing.Look at at these finds which are the worlds oldest that are close to Biblical account of Noah’s ark,This is fact and not just theory.

There is no dispute that the first known human empire states were in ancient Sumer and Egypt.Sumer validated by the Gen.11 with the tower of Bavel/Babel account and Egypt’s account in Exodus.If you are curious about Sumer and Babel read my previous Tower of Babel blog.There is no existing physical evidence of ancient (that is older than 3000 BCE) civilization outside of the fertile crescent (the middle east).

Another thing history is in full agreement on is that the first known people were hunter gatherers and that farming came later.

“The fear and terror of you will be on every wild animal and birds in the sky and with all that creeps on the ground and fish of the sea.In your hands they are given and every crawling thing that is alive will be food for you,as are herbs and plants ,I have given you eveything”.Gen 9:2-3 (Tree of Life version)

So people can hunt game and gather herbs and plants and eat anything accept the restriction in Gen:9:4-5 states.

So there is no dispute people were first hunter gatherers when civilization began.

Also if humanity came from central Sub-Saharan Africa and there was a reason (like natural disaster or famine) that they didn’t settle there because of lack of evidence of civilization there.Why didn’t some go south toward southern Africa ,why no evidence of civilization in southern Africa,why did civilization all of a sudden spring up in the central Asian steppe.So science is trying to tell us humans transitioned from ape to modern man in mid central Sub-Saharan Africa.But without evidence of civilization on the way showed up on the border of Armenia and Iran ,then drifted west to the Tigres and Euphrates river area in ancient Sumer/Kengir/Shinar.Did they use the Michael J. Fox Delorian time machine or did Scotty from Star trek beamed them over or something.People don’t move without evidence of settlement.All the trails of known human settlement lead back to central Asia and the middle east.I don’t buy we evolved from apes and life started in Africa.Why is the Armenian language a direct branch of proto-Indo-European if at one time there was not a single human language around Turkiye,Armenia and Iran.Could an ancient form of Armenian itself been the pre Bavel/Babel language? We don’t know but it makes sense to me ,Armenia was the original Turkey (Anatolia) ,Turkey was not Turkey until the Turks came from Mongolia in the middle ages.Then conquered most of Greece,Anatolia and the Balkans.

The Turks originated in western Mongolia and most historians believe like the Huns were a exiled tribe of the Xiongnu ,a western Chinese people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiongnu#:~:text=The%20Xiongnu%20(Chinese%3A%20%E5%8C%88%E5%A5%B4%3B,BC%2C%20founded%20the%20Xiongnu%20Empire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples

Turkic people began to conquer southeastern Europe in the early middle ages and took Constantinople may 29th 1453 and the Byzantine Empire became modern Turkiye/Turkey

So the area around the landing of the Noachian ark would have been Armenia then not Turkey and it goes without saying that Noah well pre existed Greek control of Anatolia.So Noah’s ark landed in Armenia then.

Also evolutionists all say humans left Africa and went to Asia and the further disbursed from there.

https://humanorigins.si.edu/education/introduction-human-evolution#:~:text=Humans%20first%20evolved%20in%20Africa,different%20species%20of%20early%20humans.

So the scriptures are still holding up on Asia (specifically central Asia) being ground 0 for human civilization.And evolution theory still has not provided a reason for no one staying and starting a large civilization in Sub-Saharan Africa.If life started there then why no civilization there until well after the middle east had civilization.

Also all the pictures or rock carvings on Gobekli Tepe show animals ,either predator or prey and do not show signs of farming.This is further proof of at this time a hunter gatherer culture as the Bible says at this time.

A separated head between animals on a stone slab from Göbekli Tepe