In my first 4 articles on Babel I wrote last year I fully established that all languages came from one source but I could not definitively lock down the specific source.I also know that the first part of this article was a bit all over the place ,my articles are usually more organized.However I feel I put forth important information that makes sense.Even though I could not pin down the exact connection between the Urals and the Celts ,however as they say in a court of law.I think I made a good common sense circumstantial case for the Uralic-Celtic connection.

ReportAncient Genomes Reveal Yamnaya-Related Ancestry and a Potential Source of Indo-European Speakers in Iron Age Tianshan

• •Iron Age Shirenzigou individuals are genetically admixed of east and west Eurasians
• •The west Eurasian ancestry is most like Yamnaya related
• •The east Eurasian ancestry is more like northeast Asian related
• •Strong evidence for the introduction of Indo-European languages into Xinjiang

Summary

Recent studies of early Bronze Age human genomes revealed a massive population expansion by individuals-related to the Yamnaya culture, from the Pontic Caspian steppe into Western and Eastern Eurasia, likely accompanied by the spread of Indo-European languages [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The south eastern extent of this migration is currently not known. Modern-day human populations from the Xinjiang region in northwestern China show a complex population history, with genetic links to both Eastern and Western Eurasia [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. However, due to the lack of ancient genomic data, it remains unclear which source populations contributed to the Xinjiang population and what was the timing and the number of admixture events. Here, we report the first genome-wide data of 10 ancient individuals from northeastern Xinjiang. They are dated to around 2,200 years ago and were found at the Iron Age Shirenzigou site. We find them to be already genetically admixed between Eastern and Western Eurasians. We also find that the majority of the East Eurasian ancestry in the Shirenzigou individuals is-related to northeastern Asian populations, while the West Eurasian ancestry is best presented by ∼20% to 80% Yamnaya-like ancestry. Our data thus suggest a Western Eurasian steppe origin for at least part of the ancient Xinjiang population. Our findings furthermore support a Yamnaya-related origin for the now extinct Tocharian languages in the Tarim Basin, in southern Xinjiang.

Here is a link to the whole article

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982219307717

I think we can say with good certainty that the Yamnaya were the children of Gomer AKA The Proto Indo-Europeans,Turks who became both western Chinese(Mongols) and North And South American people.

Let us now look at the table of nations and put forth a theory.

After the flood all of Noah’s children spoke one language and then at some point in time to which Genesis does not specify exactly.A tower or ziggurat was built in ancient Sumer who I have identified as Etana of Kish( my theory only ).Then a language catastrophe happened as a result but who was patient zero as they say and can we work back and find out?It mentions Kush and Nimrod so we are dealing the grandchildren or even great grandchildren of Noah’s children.So if Kush and Nimrod were involved in Babel and Kush was the son of Cham,so, Yefet,Cham and Shem all spoke one language.

From Deuteronomy 32.8-9

8 When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance,
    when he divided all mankind,
he set up boundaries for the peoples
    according to the number of the sons of Israel.^[a]
9 For the Lord’s portion is his people,
    Jacob his allotted inheritance. (the Dead Sea scrolls say children of God/angels as opposed to children of Israel)

I will not attempt to identify 70 nation however because it is speculative ,we know some of the big stuff but I won’t attempt to specify 70 nations because it would be impossible to be precise because there is disagreement on the issue.

Let us start with Ubaid period or The Proto-Euphratean period ,this was when after the ark landing people settled in Sumer coming from the east (Genesis 11.1-2) Shinar is Sumer and this is when the proto Adamic language was spoken or we could call it “Proto Emegir” (that is what Sumerians or the “Kengir” called their language) And Emegir or Sumerian has no known source or language it connects with which I believe it’s proof of the language catastrophe at Babel.I will deal with language families not Nations themselves.

We know Abraham was from Ur so we know but so was Kush a son of Cham and although scholars call Canaanite a Semitic language Canaan was of Cham.but lets get back to southern Iraq ,there were both Semtites and Cushites but more of the children of Kush went to Africa.

We will say from Proto Emegir came Akkadian the first Semitic language known which evolved into Old Aramaic which is eastern Branch of the Semitc languages ,with Ugaritic, Hebrew and Arabic making up the western half of Semitic languages.The countries of Lebanon,Syria, Jordan and parts of Iraq and all of Arabia make up the full children of Shem or the Semites.Let us remember the genetic line is not pure there are descendents of Kush in the Aramaic and Arabic speaking people ,Cushetic-Semitic mixture is high I suspect especially in modern day Iraq.

From Proto Emegir came Kush who settled much of parts of the Middle East and North Africa.The Egyptians came from Mitzraim and the original Canaanites and Phoenicians until those areas where replaced with the Semitic Edomites later on.Then from Fut came Berber which was the north African language before the Muslim conquests.Also from Fut came Chadic which connects the lower Sahara with Subharan Africans.

Then from Proto Emegir came the Yamnaya’s who went east from Sumer who were the children of Yefet(Japheth) and the whole first article focused on them.Populating Europe,Central Asia, India,Siberia,western China,the Turk lands in between and also the Dene people or that is natives of the America’s.

As far as is known Chinese and other southern Asians came from Syn mentioned in Isaiah 49:12 and there is no indication which ancestry Syn or the Sin’im were from originally.We must accept that people intermingle and that human genealogy will never be easy or pure because the world has intermixed so much.The DNA in southern India is different than in the north and with the factor of continental drift and the fact that just after the flood all the continent were one.

This here from the National Library of Medicine.

Africa, India and Madagascar were once part of the supercontinent of Gondwana. This land mass began to fragment approx. 170 million years ago, and by 83 million years, all of the major components we recognize today were separated by tracts of water. Madagascar’s fossil record and estimates of the timing of the extant vertebrate radiations in Madagascar are not easily reconciled with this history of fragmentation. Fossil faunas that lived prior to approx. 65 million years had a cosmopolitan flavour, but this was lost after the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary.

Aside from the fact we do not believe that the earth is anywhere near 170 million years it shows migration from Africa to Asia and also Oceania is quite feasible.I believe far southern Asia ,Oceania,India and Australia are heavily intermixed.Which is exactly what God wanted ,God wanted variety or else he would not have scattered humanity.

We will close here ,God Bless and best wishes and put and questions in comments.