Comments

26 responses to “The Trinity and why does it matter?”

1. 

   moshe kerr

   September 28, 2026

   Welcome to my Sukkah: An interpretation of the 13 tohor middot

   Throughout the year after we say the opening p’suk of ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא Israel has the established custom to whisper ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעוךם ועד. But on Yom Kippur the custom practiced by the Cohen nation to cry aloud ‘ברוך שם כבוד וכו. Before the דם חיי sprinkled 7 times before the פרכת, (the k’vanna of Yom Kippur) which starkly contrasts with the goat dedicated to עזאזל; the serving Cohen makes a private ודוי for himself and his House, which duplicates the ודוי wherein the scapegoat to עזאזל bears the guilt of the Cohen nation as a whole.

   The 2nd sugya on this 3rd פרק Mishna, frames a מחלקת between rabbi Meir and the Sages. But the critical observation and logical דיוק screams off the dof of :לו comparable to ברוך שם כבוד … The עצם language of the Shemone Esrei lacks any ודוי what so ever. The 3rd Middle Blessing סלח לנו – emphatically aligns with the 3rd middah of the Horev revelation אל — the rebuke wherein the מלאך whom Yaakov wrestled prior to meeting his brother Esav who approached with an Army, according to the Targum of Uziel, numbered 400 Officers! The name ישראל defines the k’vanna of all prophetic prophesies. Prophets command mussar and the seed of Yaacov “grews from generation to generation by remembering prophetic mussar rebukes within our Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts.” The name ישראל defines the entirety of all T’NaCH, Talmudic, Midrash, and Siddur spirituality in that one Name change made by a מלאך.

   The Book of בראשית for the first time introduces the wisdom-time oriented commandment of sending מלאכים as an act of War. Yaacov sent a מלאך to his brother and לשמה sent Moshe as a מלאך to judge the Gods worshipped by Par’o and Egypt. This critical Torah theme defines the k’vanna of the blessing of ברכת כהנים – through the active pursuit of sanctifying wisdom-time oriented commandments that Israel prevails over our hostile enemies as did the Avot by means of wisdom “commandments” – the Avot mitzvot of the Torah revelation at Sinai – these commandments require the k’vanna לשמה – a sanctity of קידושה infinitely higher than תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות which do not by rote definition have any k’vanna.

   However through משנה תורה — בניני אבות a toldot secondary commandment can become an Av wisdom-time oriented commandment; this applies from the toldot commandments contained within the Constitutional Torah text and the Oral Torah codification of common law halachot by means of Aggadic or Midrashic drosh back to T’NaCH בניני אבות mussar אל etc. precedents of T’NaCH common law.

   The dispute between rabbi Meir and the Sages – a יחיד כנגד רבים – dispute. This kind of dispute the Germara brings as a precedent to interpret the language of the Mishna viewed from a fixed perspective. The Mishna has depth which requires פרדס inductive reason to correctly interpret its intent. No different from the 5th Book of the Torah makes a sugya legislative review משנה תורה upon other בניני אבות similar sugyot throughout the other 4 Books of the Torah who share a defined Oral Torah middot מכנה משותף required to add fractions.

   The distinction between the 10-12 ודוי middot from the closing 13th middah – the distinction מאי נפקא מינא – an Aramaic Gemarah term which makes the critical הבדלה (((A verb independent from motza’ei Shabbat; this latter wisdom-time oriented commandment makes a t’rumah from chol distinction between מלאכה vs. עבודה.))),,,[רב חסד] — wisdom which discerns לשמה\חיים from לא לשמה/גלוט מות.

   Compare פרק ראשון ר”ה: בר”ה כל באי עולם עוברין לפניו כבני מרון שנאמר (תהילים לג) היצר יחד לבם המבין אל כל מעשיהם. כנגד פרק שלישי – כל השפרות כשרים חוץ משל פרה The בנין אב which interprets the opening Mishna the distinction between the righteous vs wicked vs a bit of both this and that. The latter type of Jews Yom Kippur seals the din – לפי שאין קטגור נעשה סנגור. Hence the בניני אבות applicable to the Tzaddik not applicable to the wicked. The same ruling equally applies to the distinction between the two goats. Hence Yom Kippur prioritizes the דאורייתא מידות\confession which starts with the distinction from לשמה blessed to לשמה cursed — חיים כנגד מות — ארץ ישראל כנגד גלות.

   Talmudic judicial common law learns by means of precedents. The דם חיי sprinkled upon the פרכת\/כפרה the middot of לשמה לשמה … נצר חסד לאלפים whereas the ודוי places upon the head of the scapegoat, which a person can add within the blessing שמע קולינו, the rabbinic ודוי established by David Daniel and Ezra. The language of the rabbinic confession excluded from the Shemon Esrei like similar the requirement to sanctify a blessing-oath which requires שם ומלכות not found in the opening blessing! Learning requires that the generations of Israel make the logical דיוק; which the kabbalah of RambaN called White Fire and Black Fire in the introduction of his commentary to the Chumash.

   As תהילים employed in the פסוקי דזמרה elevated to the קידושה of a blessing through the ברוך שאמר והיה העולם which “rhetorically” employs שם ומלכות. However rote reading words in the Siddur amounts to a טיפש פשט. Impossible to define an unknow abstract term by using the same term to define itself any more than making ad hominem personal attacks ie Blood libels\unilateral declarations of Jew guilt/\ qualifies as anything other than slander, libel, evil eye, לשון הרע tumah middot spirits which emote from the Yatzir HaRah within the heart.

   The 13th Oral Torah middah has an עין טוב and only declares during the Month of Elul the tohor conclusion. However the din of the wicked equally implied by making the required דיוק. The sages prefer – חטאתי עויתי פשעתי because Jews most essentially existed in g’lut. תעשה תפילתך במקום קבוע where מקום understood as a רמז to השם entails affixing the 13 middle blessings to the 13 Horev middot. Hence the blessing ולמלדינים אל תהי תקוה, this blessing affixes to the wicked such as the Shomronim, the Tzeddukim, the Jews who embrace JeZeus as moshiach, the karaim, and Islam – all of whom declare themselves as the true faith and all of whom rejected the revelation of the Oral Torah middot together with wisdom-time oriented Av commandments which תמיד מעשה בראשית create from nothing מלאכים tohor Jews who rule the conquered land of Canaan send to judge the Gods worshipped by the Goyim.

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. 

   moshe kerr

   September 30, 2026

   Inductive Case Law (Common Law/Pardes/Middot) vs. Deductive Statute Law (Greek Logic/Shulchan Aruch/Rambam/Qur’anic Literalism); the Hellenization of Jewish Law via the Rambam. Mapping the structural anatomy of Sola Scriptura across three Abrahamic traditions. Munkir al-Hadith (Qur’anism), Karaism, and Protestantism function not merely as “reforms” but as substitute theologies of Av tuma avoda zarah – attempts to collapse the prophetic mussar rebukes which defines the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the hearts of all bnai brit Cohen peoples in all generations.

   Qur’anism/Munkir al-Hadith rejects the Hadith/Sunnah as a binding independent source of law, leaving only the Qur’an. Like Karaites, they face the crisis of ambiguity. The Qur’an commands prayer but doesn’t detail the rakat (( a unit of Islamic prayer (Salah) that consists of a sequence of movements and recitations, including standing, bowing, prostration, and sitting)); it commands charity but doesn’t set the nisab ((the minimum amount of wealth a Muslim must possess for one lunar year before being obligated to pay zakat, which is typically set at 87.48 grams of gold or 612.36 grams of silver)). Without Hadith, they must reconstruct these details using either pure linguistic deduction or modernist reasoning—effectively creating a new “oral law” without admitting it.

   Modern Qur’anists divorce Islamic practice from the Hadith’s contextual nuance. Both prioritize a “clean,” accessible code over the messy, living tradition of judicial precedent. The spiritual “addiction” to the heroin of frozen deductive Greek logic has dramatically shaped all communities following the Islamic invasion of Spain. The consequence of defining “law” through Greek and Roman cultural perspectives of Senate Statute law decrees rather than dynamic courtroom legislative review has produced a ירידות הדורות curse upon g’lut Jewry, Islam and Xtianity; perhaps best understood through Universal Monotheism (like Islam’s Tawhid) as the priority of faith over the righteous pursuit of justice as the prime theme of remembering the salvation from Egyptian slavery.

   Historically, Karaites developed a robust system of Ijtihad (independent reasoning) and even adopted some rabbinic customs when logic dictated it. They were not “fundamentalists” in the modern sense; many were rationalists influenced by Islamic Mu’tazila theology. Their rejection of the Oral Law was often driven by the desire to align Judaism with Greco-Islamic rationalism. Sunni Islam, once the four Madhabs closed the “gate of Ijtihad”, Sunni law became statutory.

   Consequently, the Munkir al-Hadith qualify (so to speak) as the “Protestants” of Islam, trying to reopen the gate by removing the intermediary (Hadith), but they often end up relying on secular academic linguistics or Sufi mysticism to fill the gaps—creating a new “Magisterium” of intellectuals. Most classical Karaites and early Qur’anists contrast with the Xtian religious literalism, for a spell their hyper-intellectualism dominated the World. They valued grammar, philosophy, and science more than the traditionalists, whom they saw as superstitious. Then came the horrors of Nakba Allah, the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate. Which fell to the Mongol hordes under Hulagu Khan. Baghdad was captured and sacked in 1258, ending the Abbasid Caliphate’s political rule. The consequence of this Nakba Allah disaster – witnessed the rise of modern Salafi-Jihadi literalism which inevitably flattens judicial common law courts unto belief-system religions which prioritize text-bound, universal, religious/philosophical codifications.

   A Munkir al-Hadith/Qur’anist resembles to a biblical primitivist, fundamentalist, or certain forms of Protestant scripturalism: the aim or objective: a simplified trust in “the Word” literalism. منكر الحديث compares to the Protestant revolt which rejected Orthodox and/or Catholic church Papel autocracy…Sunni tradition. The Shiite revolt consequent to the murder of Ali inclusive with Sunni because it too, akin to the Karaism revolt against the religification of the Talmud which manifested by Orthodox Judaism’s religious codifications of Talmudic judicial common law Mishnaic and Gemara texts into statute law halachic codifications which culminated in the Shulkan Aruch.

   For example: the Karaism houses rejected not the mezuzah but rather the parchments placed inside the mezuzah; they rejected the Talmudic mussar which teaches that Israel only accepted the first two Sinai commandments before demanding from Moshe that he go up Sinai and receive the rest of the Torah. That the repetition of the so-called Ten Commandments represents a משל which requires its נמשל; they reject that prophets command only mussar; that for example the 6th Oral Torah middah ערך אפים remembers Torah precedents as mussar rather than literal historical accounts such as the 10 generations which separate Adam from Noach from Avram etc or the literal Creation of the Universe as depicted in בראשית; they reject t’shuva as remembering the oaths which the Avot swore לשמה that only they would father the chosen Cohen nation. Hence, never actually 10 commandments but rather 10 times Israel tested faith as recorded in the mussar touching the Wilderness generation … that this reference of 10 mussar defines the repetition of the so-called 10 commandments.

   Hadith compares to the Karaim requirement of Jewish “literalism” in how this belief system understands Jewish internal jurisprudence – based upon the premise that the Torah represents Divine Law – akin to the Protestant “Sola Scriptura” movement. Therefore the Munkir al-Hadith, primarily a theological doctrinal description closer to “Qur’an-only” or Islamic sola scriptura; Muhammad’s role as messenger who delivers the Qur’an from later reports attributed to him inclusive of Hadith “additions” more akin to the Toseftot to the Mishna.

   According to JSTOR digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources – modern Qur’anism associates with the cultural assimilation or democratization of religious interpretation; with educated laypeople claiming direct access to the Qur’an rather than submitting to inherited scholarly authority. Both
   Karaites and Qur’anists rely more than simply exclaim public declaration for the words of the Bible – akin to the famous Monkey Trial in the 20th Century.

   Both perverse sects rejected one interpretive tradition such as פרדס-middot of inductive logical reason with some “other” interpretive tradition. Such as grammarians, or assimilated Jews of Spain whose “Orthodox” rabbis embraced as did the Tzeddukim some 1000 years earlier ancient Greek deductive logical reasoning. The most famous Spanish rabbi of this Reshonim Era, clearly the Rambam whose statute religious code directly shaped and influenced Karo’s Shulkan Aruch. Qur’anists likewise differ among themselves over Arabic vocabulary, ritual practice, inheritance, criminal law, and the status of inherited Muslim practice; therefore a more accurate description of Munkir al-Ḥadīth/rejecters of hadith – scriptural primacy or scripturalist reconstruction, and not טיפש פשט pure literalism.

   Sunni authority, distributed among jurists, schools of law, hadith scholars, seminaries, judges, and local communities. Shiʿi Islam developed more concentrated forms of scholarly authority, especially around the imamate and later the marjaʿiyya; a high-ranking cleric – such as murdered Ali – recognized as a source of emulation and guidance for followers in matters of religious law and ethics. This institution plays a significant role in the socio-cultural and political landscape of Shia communities, particularly in Iran and Iraq.

   Karaism, this interfaith comparison validates their need to not simply reject Talmudic Oral-law logic, they like the Tzeddukim and Shomronim before them had to developed their own legal tradition. Wherein that sect had to develop some forms of communal custom, and interpreted the Hebrew T’NaCH (as opposed to the Shomronim who limited their sect to their version of the Torah text). Karaite readings of passages traditionally connected with tefillin and mezuzah reject the Torah concept of swearing a Torah oath or remembering the specifics of the oath sworn by the Avot wherein they alone father the Chosen Cohen people. Rather they treat them only as metaphors rather than accepting the Talmudic “theme” taught by means of precedent common law.

   The idea that Israel directly heard only the first two commandments is a rabbinic tradition used in an argument about the number 613; such as the Order of the Shemone Esrei 3 + 13 + 3 blessings – a רמז to 613 משל which teaches the שבת נמשל which interprets shabbat as week rather than a day of the week, based upon the kiddush sanctification of shabbat which 3 times emphasizes the איסר של מלאכה – a דיוק logical reasoning which contrasts עבודה. During the 6 days of Shabbat a bnai brit sanctifies מלאכה through wisdom-time oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna.

   The Shulkan Aruch like the Rambam statute law code failed to affix Gemarah halachic precedents to interpret the language of a specific Mishna. Both statute law codes prioritized simplification of religious observance over remembering the distinction between ארץ ישראל from g’lut. Moshe Rabbeinu took the 12 Tribes out of Egypt, his last mitzva while alive – he established the Capital Crimes small Sanhedrin Courts in three of the Cities of Refuge on the other side of the Jordan river. Contrast the 1648 false messiah narishkeit, where hoards of desperate Jewish communities believed that the Mitzva of Moshiach applicable to g’lut Jewry. The mitzva of Moshiach – the dedication of Yoval liberty for the 12 Tribal Republic through righteous Sanhedrin courtroom common law, dedicated to make fair compensation of damages as the tiqqun for ‘hatred without cause’ Av tuma avoda zarah.

   The common law Gemara routinely brings Tosefta as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of the language of a specific Mishna based upon a unique perspective; akin to different witness testimony to the New Moon. Hadith reports about Muhammad’s sayings, actions, approvals, biography, and sometimes legal judgments. They function similar but differently from the Tosefta common law בניני אבות precedents. Rather they function, at least to Sunni Muslims, as the principal means of knowing the Prophet’s Sunnah. Muhammad prioritizes faith in tawhid Allah whereas post Sinai/Horev the Book of דברים limits faith to the obligation to achieve judicial justice among the 12 Tribes within the borders/jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courtroom authority; hence תורה לא בשמים היא.

   Karaism like the Qur’anists sharply limit the Talmudic masoret as authoritive much akin to the Reform and still later Historical Conservative Judaism which view the Talmud as history rather than a vision of the future when a Sanhedrin court designates the Yichus of the 12 tribes within the borders of post ’67 and Oct 7th conquered Gaza – a definition of k’vanna of the mitzva of brit-melah, based upon the mussar as introduced in the NaCH Book of Yehoshua. Prophetic mussar shares no common ground with history. All generations to eternity obligated to grow prophetic mussar within their Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts. History by definition speculative and therefore irrelevant.

   Munkir al-Ḥadīth/Qur’anism, Karaism, and Protestant scripturalism – structurally analogous movements of scriptural primacy – each challenges the binding authority of the Oral Torah\פרדס interpretive judicial common law court Sanhedrin legal system as the establishment of faith, replaced by some substitute authority such as JeZeus as the 1st Sinai commandment God, or later Allah. Despite their cultural, historical institutions, doctrines, and political circumstances – substantially different – all embrace a Universal Monotheism which rejected the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment; both Moshe and Yehoshua sent as מלאכים to Egypt and Canaan to judge the Gods. This struggle defines the entire literature of the T’NaCH; do not worship other Gods understood as the Av tumah Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart – akin to Esav and Yaacov wrestling within the womb of Rivka metaphor.

   Munkir al-Ḥadīth simply not a unified denomination equivalent to Protestantism or Karaism. In common cultural contexts it functions as a polemical designation for people who reject, or sharply restrict, the authority of hadith. Modern Qur’anists differ considerably over ritual, law, inherited Muslim practice, and the use of hadith as historical evidence, much like modern Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism treatment of the Talmud.

   Sunni Islam, compares to the Chassidus of Brezlev, only Muhammad lives as their “Pope”. The analogy to the Protestant challenge to Catholic hierarchy works only at the level of resistance to inherited interpretive authority, not at the level of institutional structure. Shiʿism developed through disputes over succession, the authority of ʿAlī and his descendants, and later doctrines of the imamate. Karaism’s rejection of the Oral Torah revelation places them within the camps of Shomronim and Tzeddukim kapo-like מלשינים. The Hadith simply qualify as a broader category of reports concerning Muhammad’s sayings, actions, approvals, biography, and legal judgments. Respected by the Sunnis as the principal vehicle for knowing the Prophet’s Sunnah making them similar to that of the Tosefta.

   The Koran has no concept of ירידות הדורות, directly linked to g’lut. The idea that actions have downstream consequences akin to the ripples resultant from a rock cast into a pond. Post the public burning of all Talmudic hand written manuscripts in Paris, the supporters of the Rambam statute law code which divorced Gemarah halachic precedents as the means of interpreting the language of a specific Mishna based upon a fixed perspective and prioritized an assimilated Greek deductive reasoning logic. Later Islamic communities would likewise struggle with the influence of Greek philosophical schools. Muslim had no fall back logic system, like as did the Jewish kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning which separates the P’rushim who passed this masoret down to the rabbis – as recorded through the practice of lighting the Hanukkah lights which rejects Greek deductive logical reasoning as a kosher replacement of פרדס and rabbinic middot traditions of how to understand inductive reasoning in common law courtroom briefs based upon a comparison and contrast of precedents to the case currently heard before the Sanhedrin court.

   Post the Rambam “Civil War” all later commentaries written upon the common law codes of Rif, Rosh, and Tosafot commentary fail to treat this unique sh’itta of common law and pigeon hole all post Talmudic literature into the egg-crate block-headed box of static deductive logical reasoning.

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply
   1. 

      The Hoosac historian

      September 30, 2026

      I never knew that about Islam

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      Reply
      1. 

         moshe kerr

         October 1, 2026

         On the 5th Day of the Chag moed — a clarification resultant of Gamma Hans excellent questions

         As explained previously, the codification of the Mishna in 200, some say 210 CE roughly 75 years after the absolute disastrous defeat of Bar Kochba, where Rome renamed the conquered province Syria-Palestine. The Gemara sealed by Rav Ashi & Ravina in about 450 in Iraq; further editions made by the Sovariim scholars till about 600 CE! As such both the Mishna and Bavli Gemara more resemble Herzl’s “Jewish State”. No Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribe ever existed “historically”. Both king Shaul slaughtered the Kohonim of Nov as did king David ordered the death of Uriah – WITHOUT a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes trial. Hence neither king ever established Federal Sanhedrin common law legislative review of any and all statute law passed by Tribal authorities and/or the king of Jerusalem over a united 12 Tribe Republic.

         Torah common law in essence interpretive rather than historical! When Herzl wrote his definitive work of political Zionism, Jews had endured almost 2000 years of g’lut! Hence the same equally applies to the authorship of both the Mishna and Bavli Gemara! From beginning to end – post Shoah Israeli National Independence – both the Bavli Talmud and Herzl’s ‘The Jewish State’ do NOT refer to history but rather encompass an interpretive vision of the Jewish state in the future.

         As the T’NaCH engages in the history of kings, its foolish to assume that the T’NaCH primarily concerns historiography. T’NaCH prophets command mussar applicable to all generations of Bnai Brit Cohonim nationals ie the 12 Tribal yichus directly referenced in both the Torah and Book of Yehoshua. Confusing a secondary “detail” for the primary “k’vanna” amounts to confusion. Foreign invasions proved conclusively that prior to the people asking for a king in the Book of Shmuel, that the 12 tribes collectively as a whole ever enjoyed Yovel liberty based upon Moshe taking all Israel out of Egyptian slavery precedent.

         History serves as contexts to make a depth analysis interpretation. The Mongols destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate in Iraq in 1258, the king of France and Pope ordered the public burning of all Talmudic manuscripts within France in 1242 under Louis IX. The interpretation of history: both the Muslims and Jews, so to speak ‘Circled their Wagons’. Prior to the disaster to both separate societies: Muslim wisdom and knowledge served as the light and model to the rest of the primitive & barbaric European countries – stuck in the Dark Ages.

         After Rabbeinu Yonah realized that he had duplicated the exact same error as did the brothers dynastic dispute wherein the Romans occupied Jerusalem and appointed Herod ‘their’ king on that throne; Rabbeinu Yonah requested permission to burn Maimonidean works. Rabbinic g’lut Orthodoxy – unlike the P’rushim לשמה legalism – they thereafter embraced Greek schools of logic as kosher and therein blew out the Hanukkah lights. Despite assimilation to Greek culture, philosophy and logic – being a pig. Akin to Muhammad’s koran declared camels – clean! Furthermore, Rabbeinu Yonah profaned his public vow to visit the grave of Rambam.

         Almost all later Talmudic commentaries written AFTER Rabbeinu Yonah invalidated his נידוי, [[[the most notable exceptions being the Rosh common law codification of the Talmud and such as Hasdai Crescas Or Hashem]]], the public burning of all Talmud manuscripts from France and the later expulsion of all Jews from France in 1306, virtually ceased all opposition to Jews learning and copying Greek philosophical schools of logic – a direct Torah negative commandment which interprets Egypt and Canaan as לאו דוקא.

         The T’NaCH historical narratives serve as instruments of mussar, the oath brit sworn to and by the Avot defines t’shuva memory! Torah as a Constitutional document – NOT – a g’lut religious faith in some theologically constructed theology, such as Islam’s Tawhid Monotheism narishkeit. תורה לא בשמים היא the essential responsibility to rule the conquered land of Canaan through Sanhedrin common law legislative review of Tribal statute laws and some undefined Torah rhetoric “king” inclusive under the Torah Constitutional mandate which establishes משנה תורה courtroom authority has never yet occurred in any generation of the Jewish people to date.

         LikeLike
      2. 

         moshe kerr

         October 4, 2026

         “The UN says so” is not a sufficient legal analysis. This example serves the false logic of “Appeal to Authority”. Attempts to pigeon hole, post the illegal Jordanian nationalization “West Bank”, as a “geographic term” used “internationally” fails to weight the bias of UN SC Resolution 2334 on par with UN GA Resolution 3379.

         The UN has a long history of anti-Israel activities. Hence the language “West Bank” hardly qualifies as an accurate “geographic term”. Wars and Treaties trump UN chatter-box revisionist history. The ICC and ICJ. Their decisions may assert jurisdiction under their own constitutive instruments, but that does not automatically prove that they can override Oslo’s allocation of authority, treat Gaza as under unified Palestinian control, or transform a diplomatic designation into uncontested sovereignty. Those conclusions require a separate and explicit legal argument—and remain open to substantial criticism.

         Germany’s 1941 invasion destroyed the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact as a functioning nonaggression arrangement, regardless of the formal language used to describe its termination. SALT ceased to function as a respected arms-control framework once the parties no longer treated its restraints as politically operative. Trump’s withdrawal reflected a rejection of Obama’s Iran policy, regardless of whether the JCPOA was technically classified as a treaty.

         The parties’ conduct, interests, and subsequent events determine whether Oslo remains a functioning political framework. An international court cannot preserve, revive, or transform Oslo by treating it as though it were an abstract instrument detached from the parties’ actual consent and conduct. Hamas did not sign Oslo, took control of Gaza from the PA, and does not accept Oslo’s framework. Treating “Palestine” as a unified actor with uninterrupted authority over Gaza risks confusing a diplomatic label with an actual governing and treaty relationship.

         An agreement loses authority when the parties’ strategic interests and conduct show that they no longer accept it as controlling. Arafat launched the 2nd Intifada in 2000, this decision fundamentally breached the Oslo Accords as did his failure to amend the PA Charter as he formally agreed to do when signing the Oslo Accords. UN Resolutions Chapter VI or Chapter VII do not have more authority than treaties signed between allies. The UN compares to the recent terrorist attempt to slaughter Israelis during the recent 2026 Sukkot Chag, which had it succeeded might have shattered the Abraham Accords and made the UN 2 State Solution dictate to Israel – the only game in town.

         The UN can use only the powers actually given to it by the UN Charter. Those powers do not, merely because they come from the UN, automatically cancel, rewrite, or override the Oslo agreements. Anyone making that argument must show exactly which Charter power is being used, why the relevant UN body has authority over the issue, and how that power legally interacts with the parties’ existing treaty obligations. Saying “the UN has authority” – a bogus argument. The claim must identify the particular organ—such as the Security Council, General Assembly, or another body—and the specific Charter provision that allegedly grants the power.

         Propaganda rhetoric of the UN – Occupied West Bank Territories – presumes Judea and Samaria as false based upon the language of UN SC 2334. The revisionist history pretends akin to Arafat’s rhetoric that the Palestinian people trace their roots back to the Boat-People Philistines from the Greek Islands! Never in all recorded Human history an Arab Palestinian State. Refusal by UN bodies to call a spade a spade – Yechuda and Samaria prove a bias conclusion rather than an objective recommendation.

         General Assembly recognition of Palestine and British most recent boycott of Israeli private industry in Judea & Samaria prove political bias. That Israel has only responded to London and not EU countries who likewise seek to dictate a two State “Final Solution” compares to the vision of Jewish refugees treatment during the Middle Ages. The latter ‘low hanging fruit’, so too Britain after Brexit.

         Even if a UN organ has some Charter-based authority, the claimant must explain why that authority applies to the parties and how it legally affects their treaty obligations. Employment of UN Charter-based authority arguments almost 100 years after the fact compares to Xtian gospel claims of Messiah man/God over 1000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The latter example throughout history defined through hate arousing Christ killer rhetoric. Never once did the Goyim NT ever raise the issue: How does the Torah itself define the mitzva of Moshiach? As such both the earlier NT propaganda and the UN Charter propaganda used to promote anti-Israel hatred. Appeals to UN authority do not, by themselves, establish that the Oslo agreements have been changed or overridden. That conclusion requires a specific Charter power, proper jurisdiction, and a legally reasoned explanation of how the power affects the parties’ treaty obligations.

         LikeLike
      3. 

         The Hoosac historian

         October 5, 2026

         Even if a UN organ has some Charter-based authority, the claimant must explain why that authority applies to the parties and how it legally affects their treaty obligations. Employment of UN Charter-based authority arguments almost 100 years after the fact compares to Xtian gospel claims of Messiah man/God over 1000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The latter example throughout history defined through hate arousing Christ killer rhetoric. Never once did the Goyim NT ever raise the issue: How does the Torah itself define the mitzva of Moshiach? As such both the earlier NT propaganda and the UN Charter propaganda used to promote anti-Israel hatred. Appeals to UN authority do not, by themselves, establish that the Oslo agreements have been changed or overridden. That conclusion requires a specific Charter power, proper jurisdiction, and a legally reasoned explanation of how the power affects the parties’ treaty obligations.

         Also Christianity benefited the creation of Israel by Britain procuring it from the Turks in 1918 which put in in good hands so after WW2 Israel could be free. American Christians have been in the past 40 years Israel’s strongest supporters.

         LikeLike
      4. 

         moshe kerr

         October 5, 2026

         Israel no more created than the US created. LOL

         LikeLike
      5. 

         moshe kerr

         October 5, 2026

         No judgement … 9 [# of truth] judgment-calls which have enriched the American People, that Trump 2.0 achieved, prior to the Mid-Term elections?

         Trump 1.0 trashed the internationalization of US strategic interests with America First by destroying the Obama treaty which granted the Mullahs “permission” to develop the “Bomb”. Trump 2.0 has continued where he left off. #2. Not since Reagan fired the bureaucraps of the Air Traffic Controllers has a US President threatened mass firings and trimming of the US bureaucracies (plural agencies). Based upon the premise “All Power to the States to bureaucratically regulate trade and commerce inside each and every State of the Republic; contrast Clinton’s hatred of the Electoral College established by the Framers of the Constitution to protect States with small populations from being dominated by States with huge populations otherwise know as Democratic mob-rule.

         #3. America destroyed the USSR under Reagan only to witness the Democraps embrace Socialism? Not under Trump’s watch. #4. Trump Derangement Syndrome has on multiple occasions in 2.0 attempted to assassinate the President, a step beyond the Obama/Clinton Russia-Gate abomination; supported by the Rachel Maddow and MSM Pravda Press monopoly on the replacement of hard News with slanted propaganda emotion arousing opinion slander. The wings of CNN NBC and CBS fake noise news. That clap-trap “comedy”, its wings got slightly clipped akin to the corruption in the Federal bureaucracy with its revolving door Army brass incest with the Industrial Military Complex and the Central Bank Federal Reserve. Contrast the noise made by Trump’s construction plans vs the gross Democrap silence during the recently fired Head of the Central Bank whore-house expansion of the Federal Reserve building; Democrap corruption compares to how the UN – as a rule – singles out Israel for condemnations – how the Democrap whores cast reliable allies under the bus when it serves their self serving masturbate interests!!

         #5. Restoring the pre-Wilson policy of relying upon tariffs as a primary tool wherein Washington taxes foreign countries rather than the American people to pay for the Federal budget; starting with closing US borders to illegal aliens, coupled with giving them Bill of Rights “RIGHTS”, which define both Obama and Biden. The whole purpose of the US Constitution to distinguish US citizen rights — from serf slavery. #7. Imposing voter ID and restricting mail-in voting.

         #8. Not since Nixon coupled the US dollar to OPEC oil sales a “monopoly” which made the USD the international currency of the Planet by switch the dollar from a commodity based currency to a debt-war economy, (modeled after Lincoln’s Green back by which the Northern States paid for the Civil War), has a US President secured the dominance of the US dollar by controlling the Oil markets and breaking Chines dominance over Panama and critical minerals like rare-earth elements and graphite – monopoly.

         LikeLike
      6. 

         moshe kerr

         October 6, 2026

         President Donald Trump is backing Israel in the current rupture with the United Kingdom, though his support has been characterized by notable silence rather than active diplomatic intervention. While Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the U.S. would “obviously” not join the British sanctions initiative, Trump himself has not publicly objected to London’s punitive measures against West Bank settlements, a silence that has been interpreted by London socialists as a lack of strong support for Israel.  

         Trump’s administration has maintained a distance from the direct confrontation, with Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, warning of economic impacts on British businesses, but no direct presidential intervention has been reported to mediate the dispute. Jewish refugee populations repeatedly expelled, dispossessed, confined, or forced to migrate by European authorities. Examples include the expulsion of Jews from England in 1290, France in 1306, and Spain in 1492, followed by pogroms, forced conversions, discriminatory laws, and ultimately the Shoah.

         But forced population transfers of dhimmi Jewish populations likewise in Arab Caliphate lands. The threat of forced conversions forced Jews to flee from Muslim Spain; the Rambam forced to immigrate to Egypt. Ibn Ezra’s son converted to Islam. Another infamous example: the false messiah Sabbatai Zevi too forced to convert to Islam; while his equally notorious false messiah Yaacov Frank converted to Catholicism. In short, Jewish religious autonomy throughout g’lut history – permanently overshadowed by “ethnic cleansing” by both Monotheistic religions.

         Across Europe as Easter approached the blood libel burned across both Catholic and Protestant “ethnic cleansing” expressed through pogroms. Three Centuries of Catholic imposed ghetto gulags differs from Gazan refugees forced to flee to specific locations in Gaza which London now calls “ethnic cleansing and genocide”? The British developed concentration camps during the Boer War.

         IDF compels Gazans to listen to forced sermons in their Mosques, or economic discrimination based upon their religion? Absurd, Gazans worked inside Jewish communities as spies! Hamas knew the defensive strengths and weaknesses of those communities, which it use on Oct 7th to commit “genocide”. More Israelis men, women and children slaughter than sixteen 9/11 attacks used by Cheney/Bush to justify the invasion of Iraq, together with Britain whose slaughter, & ensuing social anarchy and Civil War greatly contributed to the later Arab Spring! Yet Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack and ‘fears of weapons of mass destruction, comparable to the slander: ”ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza!

         The Nazis established their holding ghetto in Poland’s captured Capital based upon Church guilt. Yet in July 2025, the UK government and other “criminal” European partners’ specifically rejected proposals to move Gaza’s population into a so-called “humanitarian city,” stating that permanent forced displacement would violate international humanitarian law. Wars and Treaties define international law not UN Chapter VI or even Chapter VII SC Resolutions. China rejected MacArthur’s attempt to unify Korea based upon the UN Chapter VII Resolution. Post the Vietnam defeat the US Congress passed the War Powers Act which likewise rejects a UN ‘Police Action’ like Korea. Britain and France – both slapped down as “Great Powers” consequent to the 1956 attempt to steal the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt.

         International Law – the law of the open Seas. The UN immediate removal of its ‘Peace-keepers’ which separated Egyptian forces from Israeli forces – the UN violated international law! As such the language “International law” really means attempts by foreign interests to justify their imperialism appetites. The language “ethnic cleansing” – based upon the realities of actual wars throughout history – excludes Gaza whose population today larger than before the Oct 7th Hamas invasion of Israel. UNWRA refugee inheritance status an inverse ‘Genocide’ LIE. Refugees among all other peoples sorted out within a generation. Both Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch both notorious anti-Israel organizations. Their reputation of non-biased compares to the smirk of a whore in church on Sunday!

         Genocide – based upon the establishment of the UN itself – stands upon the Nazi Shoah. To equate the Gaza death toll to genocide, whose overall population 3 years later exceeds the pre Hamas war crime – therefore a bold faced lie similar to the WWI British propaganda which referred to the Germans as “the Huns”. Utterly obtuse to redefine ‘Genocide’ as “intent to destroy the group, in whole or in part.” Since when has any UN Resolution or slander from socialist London proven squat. London the talking puppet of Hamas terrorists! Oct 7th – “unlawful attacks” – not the role of the UN to declare that this conflict preceded Oct 7th – especially after the exceptional risk taken by PM Sharon to unilaterally withdraw Israelis from Gaza in 2005. The Pravda Press and University Campuses lynch mobs guilty of using “ethnic cleansing and genocide” as interchangeable terms! Post Oct 7th has changed everything. Israel now DEMANDS that Arab countries repatriate their “dhimmi Arab refugee populations from Gaza as did Israel the near 1,000,000 Jews expelled from Arab countries starting with Iraq in 1941.

         UN gossip society ‘Genocide Convention’ defines genocide by intent to destroy a group, in whole or in part, combined with specific acts (killing, causing serious harm, etc.). The joke: it ignores the war crimes of the Catholic Church Inquisition and Crusades! The reputation of the ICC in Hague, Netherlands stinks. Israel rejects Europes’ racist “Jewish Problem”, post Shoah no European court merits respect – NEVER AGAIN – t’shuva remembers the disgrace of Par’o courtroom corruption.

         Vichi openly collaborated with the Nazis. Belgium has no shame, its Carnival of Binche or similar folk traditions an abomination! Post war, szmalcownicy Poles mostly escaped justice for their Chamberlain blackguard cowardice & collaboration; the post war catholic 1946 Kielce Pogrom which murdered 42 Jews a bitter memory among Jewish survivors! Better to kill the dirty Jews than let them return and reclaim their properties in Poland! Post Shoah Israel remembers the church post war Rat lines to South America together with the blood libels Goyim who owed money opportunistically employed to killed the Jewish money lenders and therein cancelled all debts owed! Post Shoah Europe proved its reputation as morally dead. Israel rejects any British moral superiority we hold it on par with the Nazi superior race bull shit and Gaza “industrialized genocide” which ignores the current war in the Ukraine and the post Pearl Harbor atomic bombs dropped upon two Japanese cities.

         LikeLike
      7. 

         moshe kerr

         October 29, 2026

         Post Israeli elections again wish to acknowledge Gamma Hans from Germany.

         Israel challenges the prevailing Western/liberal internationalist narrative by prioritizing state sovereignty, democratic legitimacy, and realpolitik over universalist human rights dignity rhetoric. Israel – a liberal democracy – with regular, competitive elections, a robust judiciary, and free press. Its Arab citizens vote at high rates and are represented in the Knesset. Attempts to frame Israel as Apartheid or a Nazi-like state further examples of hostile EU States “the Germans are the Huns” propaganda employed during WWI. Resolution 242’s “secure and recognized boundaries”, serves as the evolutionary morph language of Resolution 2334!

         The international community’s focus on the 1948 lines as the actual basis for negotiations conceals the illegitimacy of the 1948 Arab invasion’s outcome and Jordans’ attempt to nationalize Yechuda and Samaria by prioritizing “West Bank” affixed to “Palestine” which reflects the European infatuation with the Roman empire – such as Czar Russian for Caesar! Separating politics into distinct subjects and categories negates the fact, that when water spills on a table-top it makes a mess.

         Rambam’s statute law halachic code established g’lut Judaism and Jewish identity. But imposing his statute law code upon the common law court based Mishna vision of justice in a land where the 12 Tribes rejoice through liberty from foreign rule/oppression – a revisionist history on par with the ’39 White Paper. The struggle of controlling the balance of power defines the strategic interests of nation states NOT defeated dhimmi refugee populations as presented by the UN demand for a Two State solution.

         The sovereigntist critique, such as America First, rejects liberal internationalism. It prioritizes democratic fair elections, nation state democracies mandate to protect the interests of their people by defining their borders and citizenship. International politics by contrast, driven by power and interests – NOT – abstract morality. Political rhetoric employs moral equivalence” like Obama employed the slogan “CHANGE”; he never defines the meaning of this abstract term NEVER in his 8 years as President.

         The post WWII creation of the UN just as illegitimate as the Senate rejection of Wilson’s League of Nations because of its exclusion of democratic accountability but also historically and theologically revisionist on par with the NT and Koran. The land for peace 242 paradigm stands upon the foundation of the 1956 War. Had England and France seized successfully the Suez Canal this would have secured their post War ‘Great Power’ status. Just as the reduction of Germany by about 25% — Prussian land for peace — awarded to Russia and Poland cemented the ‘Great Power’ status of the USSR.

         Obama threw his hat in support for internationalist intervension -2334; a hostile political weapon which pre-judged the outcome of negotiations, effectively declaring Israel’s sovereignty illegitimate before talks even begin. Its stands on par with the British/Jordanian West Bank is Palestine diplomatic construct designed to erase the historical Jewish connection to Judea and Samaria. The “Palestinian” national identity, as currently framed … heavily constructed around this anti-Jewish territorial claim rooted in 1948 displacement, not indigenous continuity.

         The state’s primary duty – aimed like a rifle to blow off the head of a foreign soldier – to protect its own citizens, not to abstract global moralities. The latter promises moral renewal, but delivers diplomatic dictatorships freed from the justice of oppression as experienced through the Oct 7th 2023 slaughter of Israelis! The slander wherein the PM condemned as a war criminal promotes this hogwash political rhetoric “abstract morality of globalists imperialist interests whose propaganda conceals its attempt to strip human rights from sovereignty; diplomacy from power; Jewish identity from Jewish land.

         The UN fiction duplicates the revisionist history and substitute theologies employed by both the NT and Koran frauds. UN duplicity treats Hamas/PA dictatorships as democratic partners; Arab military invasions to throw the Jews into the Sea treated as legitimate boundary-setters; exiled g’lut Judaism imposed as the true intent of Mishnaic common law judicial visions of justice righteousness.

         LikeLike
      8. 

         The Hoosac historian

         October 29, 2026

         Christians have been the biggest supporters of Israel

         LikeLiked by 1 person
   2. 

      moshe kerr

      October 5, 2026

      Understanding the k’vanna which all wisdom-time oriented Torah commandments fundamentally require to distinguish a matter of the heart from ritual actions that religious g’lut Jews do like reading words as rote child immaturity. Ritualism no more qualifies as wisdom of the Torah than Cain or the two eldest sons of Aaron who confused ritualized making a barbeque to heaven as equal to sanctifying wisdom-time oriented Av Commandments from the brit Torah faith to pursue just restitution of damages among our people when we rule the oath sworn lands: establish Yovel liberty for the 12 tribe/Republic as the k’vanna of doing brit melah upon all male children born inside the oath sworn land inheritance of the seed fathered by the Avot.

      To understand through Torah wisdom the k’vanna of wisdom-time oriented commandments as introduced in the wisdom wherein the Genesis story of creation instructs through משל\נמשל logical דיוקים. What does acquisition of a woman through קידושין actually acquire? A Jewish woman does not compare to a slave or a whore acquired through money, trade, or sex ie Yachuda & Tamar! The wisdom-time oriented commandment of קידושין “makes t’shuva” by remembering the oath sworn between the pieces wherein childless Avram cut a permanent oath brit/alliance – based upon the 1st commandment of the Torah/fruitful and multiply\, to father the chosen Cohen nation encompassing all 12 Tribes of Israel who accept the Torah revelation at Sinai in all future born ie O’lam HaBah/stars in the heavens; hence קידושין – the wisdom of acquiring Title to the future born seed this woman and baal produce.

      For example: Why the Torah din of maamzer? This din applies only to קידושין. No קידושין no maamzerim. Goyim do not do קידושין therefore maamzerim do not apply to their seed. If a woman becomes pregnant from another Man after making קידושין the child born to that illicit union a maamzer – just that simple. Hence it serves as proof that קידושין the baal acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah souls born consequent to this marital union. קידושין does not apply to Goyim because Goyim not the chosen Cohen brit-oath seed sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Torah wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna. When a man does קידושין based upon these בניני אבות herein defines the required k’vaana of the wisdom-time oriented commandment קידושין.

      Reading a Mishna through a טיפש פשט literalism fails to differentiate wisdom-time oriented commandments from positive and negative commandments. The latter “secondary commandments” do not in and of themselves require k’vanna. Not so any Av wisdom-time oriented commandment which absolutely must have prophetic mussar as its “duty of the heart” k’vanna.

      Torah a common law legalism ie משנה תורה|דברים which stands upon בניני אבות|precedents! Shallow reactionary religious statute law reading of texts fails to discern Torah judicial common law “k’vanna/intent” from Goyim legislative statute law decrees. ספר בראשית opens with the Creation aggadah and introduces the Central theme of כל התורה כולה – Av wisdom-time oriented commandments. Proof: לא תעשה מלאכה בשבת. What מאי נפקא מינא discernment of judgment separates the k’vanna of מלאכה from עבודה? Failure to discern this fundamental distinction between two similar verbs proves a fundamental lack of understanding! Shabbat not one day but rather inclusive of the entire WEEK. אסור to do מלאכה on the closing day of the week, in order to dedicate and sanctify doing מלאכה during the 6 days of the Shabbat/week. Herein the mitzva of Shabbat as introduced in the בראשית aggada serves as the required הבדלה of understanding which differentiates like from like required to sanctify all wisdom-time oriented commandments throughout the Torah and inclusive of Talmudic mitzvot according to the B’HaG!

      Wisdom-time oriented commandments, based upon the 1st Sinai לשמה – life – commandment – only sanctified within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Cursed g’lut Jewry the 2nd Sinai commandment understood as לא לשמה – death. The 1st Sinai commandment! Who brought you out of Egypt! Egypt a לאו דוקא term! Any land outside of the borders sworn to the Avot as the eternal inheritance of their chosen Cohen seed = g’lut.

      All g’lut Jewish opinions on the Torah a לא לשמה curse of Egyptian slavery! Just as Par’o court never tried criminal Par’o for criminal damages against Israelites so too all the Goyim courtrooms throughout history not different. Post exile g’lut Jewry does not compare to Israelis ruling the oath sworn lands today. Why? Justice justice pursue as faith – the obligation from the Torah for Sanhedrin courts dedicated to pursue fair restitution of damages inflicted as the tiqqun for ‘hatred without cause’ Av tumah avoda zarah among our people – only applicable where Sanhedrin common law courtrooms have jurisdiction. Sanhedrin Courts have no legal jurisdiction in g’lut lands any more than Goyim living in foreign lands liable to the death penalty for violation of the 7 laws bnai noach! Mesechta Sanhedrin aggadah which introduces the so-called 7 mitzvot bnai noach refers to gere toshav in the times when Israelites establish Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribes yichus within the borders of the Jewish state/Republic! The Talmud openly states that Yovel דאורייתא never achieved throughout the 2nd Republic/commonwealth! More King David failed in the matter of Uriah to establish Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes by judging Capital Crimes Cases before Sanhedrin courts as Moshe and Yehoshua revealed their Av k’vanna when they both established the Small Sanhedrin Cities of Refuge!

      Moshe Rabbeinu said I give you life and death, therefore choose life. This makes a משנה תורה interpretation of k’vanna which separates the tohor לשמה first Sinai commandment from the Av tumah לא לשמה second Sinai commandment. Torah a common law legal system. The 5th Book of דברים|משנה תורה reinterprets through the life/death language the k’vanna of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments. Why? Because the Talmud states that Israel at Sinai only accepted the revelation of the first two Sinai commandments prior to demanding from Moshe that he receive the rest of the Torah.

      Both Mesechta Shabbat and Baba Kama ask the question: Do the Toldot follow the Avot? Based upon the distinction between Av wisdom-time oriented commandments introduced in מעשה בראשית from תולדות secondary positive and negative Torah commandments which do not require k’vanna … but if learned through the wisdom of משנה תורה can discern through בינה the prophetic mussar which defines from the Torah and prophets the k’vanna of all wisdom-time oriented commandments for Israelis ruling the oath sworn lands which the chosen Cohen nation fathered by the Avot inherit which לשמה swore to the Avot.

      Incorrect to treat the Torah as a philosophical analogy simply because the Hanukkah lights dedicate a נדוי rejection of Greek philosophy as the basis wherein Israel forgets the [Oral] Torah as defined through the revelation of the 13 middot at Horev ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון ect and interpreted through the Tannaim kabbalah of פרדס and the rabbinic middot of 7, 10, 13, and 32 warp weft sh’ittot applicable to halacha vs aggadita wherein the 32 middot interpret the mussar of aggadic droshes upon T’NaCH Primary Sources and the 7, 10, 13 middot interpret, akin to different witnesses to the New Moon whose views determined from their fixed perspective much a like a blue print has a Front Side Top viewpoints!

      A capital crimes trial requires no less than two witnesses. Why? Because two or more witnesses make a prophetic “depth analysis” akin to the 2 sites of a rifle permits a person to shoot accurately down range. Prophetic mussar applies equally to all “down range” generations of the chosen brit Cohen nation – 12 Tribes of Israel. Yonah read through a flat טיפש פשט sent to the king who took the 10 tribes of Israel and uprooted them replaced by the abhorrent Shomronim goyim – according to the Book of Ezra who excluded them from joining the nation to sanctify mitzvot! T’shuva defined through Rosh HaShanna יום הזכרון and sealed wherein the living blood of brought before the פרכת from the treif blood of the goat cast off cliff נשא עון פשע וחטא. Hence the Shemone Esrei has no rabbinic ודוי because wisdom-time oriented commandments require making הבדלות distinctions to define their k’vanna!

      The Talmud learns t’shuva as remembering that only the Avot, not Moshe Rabbeinu or any other johnny come lately such as the near 2000 year separation from the Koran declaration that Yishmael a father due to Avraham dedicating him at the Akedah! Shomronim introduced their substitute theology wherein their Torah differs from the Torah of Israel, no different from the NT and Koran fraud books.

      As storing books often employs “book ends” so to the case between Rosh HaShanna and Yom Kippur, Pesach/counting of the Omer\Shevuoth, and Sukkot/Shemeni Atzaret. סלח לנו אבינו כי חטאנו does not qualify as a rabbinic ודוי because the Talmud instruct that a person has רשות to included the rabbinic ודוי as defined in mesechta Yoma – the dispute between rabbi Meir vs the Sages – in שמע קולינו.

      The name of ר”ה … יום הזכרון. What do Jews לשמה remember? The oath sworn to the Avot, that they alone would father the Cohen nation. If the greater party to the brit alliance swore a Torah oath לשמה the lesser party in their turn does not likewise swear a Torah oath לשמה. The generation of Israel called on יום הזכרון to remember the oaths which the Avot separately swore לשמה to father the chosen Cohen nation to all eternity. Goyim have no portion, according to the Talmud to the world to come. Specifically Goyim who A) reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai B) whose Shomronim substitute theologies replace in the case of the NT JeZeus as the God of the 1st Sinai commandment and Koran Yishmael with Yitzak at the Akadah and Allah with the revelation of the לשמה רוח הקודש with their golden calf Allah word – no different from the substitution made by the ערב רב who referred to their Golden Calf משל as אלו אלהים etc., have no portion in the world to come.

      The blowing of the Shofar requires spirits blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov from within the heart and not breath from the lungs. Blowing the Shofar a wisdom, hence its permitted even on shabbat for children to learn how to blow the shofar. עבודה not a wisdom, just that simple – this distinction separates the sanctification of shabbat which requires k’vanna from toldot cmmandments which do not require k’vanna. Error to say that ritual halacha determines the k’vanna of mitzvot! Aggadic sources of T’NaCH and Talmud define through a dosh\p’shat axis the k’vanna of ritual halachic mitzvot. Halachic mitzvot compare to the form of the Mishkan while prophetic T’NaCH\aggadic mussar k’vanna serves as the substance of the Shekinah. The mitzva of tefillah a matter of the heart, specifically the dedication of tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov as opposed to the tuma middot spirits which identify the Yatzir Ha’rah.

      Torah has the Written and the Oral Torah. No where did the Greeks burn the written Torah like as did the French king in 1242 in Paris! Hence based upon the inductive wisdom of פרדס logic which defines the Oral Torah as codified throughout the Talmud, the Greeks attempted to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah inductive logic. This substitution theology likewise expressed through the Shomronim, the Tzeddukim who denied the Oral Torah – allies of the Syrian Greeks; the Xtian church who denies the Oral Torah; the Karaim who likewise reject the Oral Torah and the Mohammadians who replace Yishmael as the Av of all Muslim peoples in direct violation of Sarah’s commandment that Yishmael would not inherit the brit faith. Brit never found in the Koran nor the NT! Covenant a false translation of brit because just as a blessing requires שם ומלכות meaning לשמה and Oral Torah middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf.

      Sanhedrin 90b & Gittin 60b explicitly distinguishes between Torah Shebichtav and Torah Shebe’al Peh. The Greek decree\gezeirah, banned the teaching and study like as later decreed the Romans. By banning the method of derivation (the 7/10/13/32 middot), they forced Israel to rely on static texts, which is the definition of Hellenization. 1 Maccabees 2:17 mentions the priestly aristocracy collaborating with Antiochus. The Khazars/Karaim rejected the Talmud and heavily relied upon a literal טיפש פשט as ideal. Xtianity replaces the Oral Torah with Dogma/Nicene Creeds; NT substitute theology errs in its bogus lie of fulfilling the Torah yet fails to preserve its Oral Torah lineage of judicial justice as the definition of faith.

      The Koran does not contain the Brit of Sinai; it claims to restore it. But it denies the Oral transmission of the Sinaitic revelation. Without the Oral Torah, the Brit becomes a dead letter. The Greeks understood this: if you kill the Oral, you kill the Brit. The Greeks tried to bypass the Oral, demanding a static belief-worship of Gods in the Heavens above. The common thread between Civil War internal enemies and Foreign attempts to conquer Israel – both this and that deny the Oral Torah. Hence the dedication of the lights of Hanukkah sanctifies akin to shabbat the victory of Inductive\dynamic inductive Oral Torah logic over deductive static and dogmatic Written-decrees only static logic ie appeals to higher authorities illogic.

      Mussar does not follow greek/geek static syllogism logic. Mussar a Yatrir spirit grown within the heart. The false syllogism logic of proving or disproving utterly false. For example: the legal precedents brought by the Prosecutor, not the same as the legal precedents brought by the defense attorney. Jewish torts courts have a minimum of 3 judges. One serves as the prosecutor, the 2nd as defense, and if a tayku occurs – where neither the opposing legal brief – merit, convinces the others legal brief precedents, then in this tayku situation the 3rd judge of the court rules one way or the other. I will remember the brit with Yaacov, the brit with Yitzak and the brit with Avraham. The 3 … 3 Opening and closing blessings remember the Avot in the order of Avraham Yitzak Yaacov vs. Yaacov Yitzak and Avraham akin to the closing Parek of ויקרא and the reverse Order of the letters in the Musof Amidah of Shabbat.

      The Oral Torah 4th tohor middah רחום affixed to the Middle blessing גואל ישראל based upon the Order of 3 + 13 + 3 blessings … when Israel makes war upon Amalek/ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים in all generations, shows no pity for the ben sorer u-Moreh, and slaughter through genocide all inhabitants of Canaan – this רחום shields מגן אברהם the nation from Torah curses. Hence רחום shares nothing with pity any more than t’shuva to alien avoda zarah – repentance! Datan and Abiram seed died similar to the stubborn and rebellious son!

      LikeLike

      Reply
3. 

   The Hoosac historian

   October 6, 2026

   “Israel no more created than the US created. LOL”

   I do not know what you are getting at.

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply
   1. 

      moshe kerr

      October 6, 2026

      President Donald Trump is backing Israel in the current rupture with the United Kingdom, though his support has been characterized by notable silence rather than active diplomatic intervention. While Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the U.S. would “obviously” not join the British sanctions initiative, Trump himself has not publicly objected to London’s punitive measures against West Bank settlements, a silence that has been interpreted by London socialists as a lack of strong support for Israel.  

      Trump’s administration has maintained a distance from the direct confrontation, with Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, warning of economic impacts on British businesses, but no direct presidential intervention has been reported to mediate the dispute. Jewish refugee populations repeatedly expelled, dispossessed, confined, or forced to migrate by European authorities. Examples include the expulsion of Jews from England in 1290, France in 1306, and Spain in 1492, followed by pogroms, forced conversions, discriminatory laws, and ultimately the Shoah.

      But forced population transfers of dhimmi Jewish populations likewise in Arab Caliphate lands. The threat of forced conversions forced Jews to flee from Muslim Spain; the Rambam forced to immigrate to Egypt. Ibn Ezra’s son converted to Islam. Another infamous example: the false messiah Sabbatai Zevi too forced to convert to Islam; while his equally notorious false messiah Yaacov Frank converted to Catholicism. In short, Jewish religious autonomy throughout g’lut history – permanently overshadowed by “ethnic cleansing” by both Monotheistic religions.

      Across Europe as Easter approached the blood libel burned across both Catholic and Protestant “ethnic cleansing” expressed through pogroms. Three Centuries of Catholic imposed ghetto gulags differs from Gazan refugees forced to flee to specific locations in Gaza which London now calls “ethnic cleansing and genocide”? The British developed concentration camps during the Boer War.

      IDF compels Gazans to listen to forced sermons in their Mosques, or economic discrimination based upon their religion? Absurd, Gazans worked inside Jewish communities as spies! Hamas knew the defensive strengths and weaknesses of those communities, which it use on Oct 7th to commit “genocide”. More Israelis men, women and children slaughter than sixteen 9/11 attacks used by Cheney/Bush to justify the invasion of Iraq, together with Britain whose slaughter, & ensuing social anarchy and Civil War greatly contributed to the later Arab Spring! Yet Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack and ‘fears of weapons of mass destruction, comparable to the slander: ”ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza!

      The Nazis established their holding ghetto in Poland’s captured Capital based upon Church guilt. Yet in July 2025, the UK government and other “criminal” European partners’ specifically rejected proposals to move Gaza’s population into a so-called “humanitarian city,” stating that permanent forced displacement would violate international humanitarian law. Wars and Treaties define international law not UN Chapter VI or even Chapter VII SC Resolutions. China rejected MacArthur’s attempt to unify Korea based upon the UN Chapter VII Resolution. Post the Vietnam defeat the US Congress passed the War Powers Act which likewise rejects a UN ‘Police Action’ like Korea. Britain and France – both slapped down as “Great Powers” consequent to the 1956 attempt to steal the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt.

      International Law – the law of the open Seas. The UN immediate removal of its ‘Peace-keepers’ which separated Egyptian forces from Israeli forces – the UN violated international law! As such the language “International law” really means attempts by foreign interests to justify their imperialism appetites. The language “ethnic cleansing” – based upon the realities of actual wars throughout history – excludes Gaza whose population today larger than before the Oct 7th Hamas invasion of Israel. UNWRA refugee inheritance status an inverse ‘Genocide’ LIE. Refugees among all other peoples sorted out within a generation. Both Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch both notorious anti-Israel organizations. Their reputation of non-biased compares to the smirk of a whore in church on Sunday!

      Genocide – based upon the establishment of the UN itself – stands upon the Nazi Shoah. To equate the Gaza death toll to genocide, whose overall population 3 years later exceeds the pre Hamas war crime – therefore a bold faced lie similar to the WWI British propaganda which referred to the Germans as “the Huns”. Utterly obtuse to redefine ‘Genocide’ as “intent to destroy the group, in whole or in part.” Since when has any UN Resolution or slander from socialist London proven squat. London the talking puppet of Hamas terrorists! Oct 7th – “unlawful attacks” – not the role of the UN to declare that this conflict preceded Oct 7th – especially after the exceptional risk taken by PM Sharon to unilaterally withdraw Israelis from Gaza in 2005. The Pravda Press and University Campuses lynch mobs guilty of using “ethnic cleansing and genocide” as interchangeable terms! Post Oct 7th has changed everything. Israel now DEMANDS that Arab countries repatriate their “dhimmi Arab refugee populations from Gaza as did Israel the near 1,000,000 Jews expelled from Arab countries starting with Iraq in 1941.

      UN gossip society ‘Genocide Convention’ defines genocide by intent to destroy a group, in whole or in part, combined with specific acts (killing, causing serious harm, etc.). The joke: it ignores the war crimes of the Catholic Church Inquisition and Crusades! The reputation of the ICC in Hague, Netherlands stinks. Israel rejects Europes’ racist “Jewish Problem”, post Shoah no European court merits respect – NEVER AGAIN – t’shuva remembers the disgrace of Par’o courtroom corruption.

      Vichi openly collaborated with the Nazis. Belgium has no shame, its Carnival of Binche or similar folk traditions an abomination! Post war, szmalcownicy Poles mostly escaped justice for their Chamberlain blackguard cowardice & collaboration; the post war catholic 1946 Kielce Pogrom which murdered 42 Jews a bitter memory among Jewish survivors! Better to kill the dirty Jews than let them return and reclaim their properties in Poland! Post Shoah Israel remembers the church post war Rat lines to South America together with the blood libels Goyim who owed money opportunistically employed to killed the Jewish money lenders and therein cancelled all debts owed! Post Shoah Europe proved its reputation as morally dead. Israel rejects any British moral superiority we hold it on par with the Nazi superior race bull shit and Gaza “industrialized genocide” which ignores the current war in the Ukraine and the post Pearl Harbor atomic bombs dropped upon two Japanese cities.

      LikeLike

      Reply
4. 

   moshe kerr

   October 7, 2026

   Great Apes share a 98.7% genome genetic match with human-beings. By what measurement readily discerns the switch from grasshopper to the cursed and utterly vile locust? Europeans minds have no loyalty to their allies when loyalty – goes out of fashion.

   Houston Stewart Chamberlain: A British-born Germanophile and racial ideologist (1855–1927) whose work The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century advocated for the superiority of the Aryan race and claimed Jewish influence was negative. His theories influenced Adolf Hitler and National Socialist thought, and he viewed the conflict between Aryans and Jews as the basis of European history.

   Neville Chamberlain: The British Prime Minister (1937–1940) pursued a policy of appeasement toward Nazi Germany, which included signing the Munich Agreement (1938) that sacrificed Czechoslovakia. He also expressed antisemitic attitudes in private letters and his government introduced the White Paper (1939) which denied Jews unrestricted entry to Mandatory Palestine which

   Britain needed acetone as a solvent to manufacture cordite, a smokeless gunpowder used in its munitions. Political Zionist, Chaim Weizmann developed a bacterial fermentation method that produced acetone from starch; his contribution helped solve a serious acetone shortage during WWI. How did the British government award Weizmann’s contribution to the war effort to defeat the “ethnic cleansing” “Germanic Huns”? The British government’s most famous political concession to Herzl’s Political Zionism vision; David Lloyd George’s government on November 2, 1917, became the great power “partner” which Herzl’s “The Jewish State” required in order for Jews to achieve permanent equal rights to achieve self-determination within the borders of their own homeland.

   Later revisionist history sources such as the corrupt Wikipedia whose story line can change at the whip of a pen, claim that the Balfour Declaration reflected some undefined and never proven temporary “strategic and political calculations”. Hence the Balfour Declaration stands as the opposite – so to speak – bookend as the Chamberlain White Paper. The White Paper declared where permanently decreed minority Jewish populations could and could not live within the promised lands of an Arab Palestinian state within 10 years after the war. The UN SC later passed 2334 whose language likewise declares “as the New UN International Law”, the bogus declaration where Israelis can live and operate businesses like as the current Socialist Government boycotts Israeli private industry and housing within the Capital of Jerusalem and Judea/Samaria as if dirty Jews Europeans possess the God Given power of kings to establish Ghetto-gulags like as did the Popes of Rome!

   Based upon the fact, that all Arab Israeli wars fought over Arab rejection of Jewish self determination as defined through the Balfour Declaration, the White Paper coupled with the British wartime policy and post war policy of restricting Jewish escape to the mandate territories, later revisionist history which declares a Arab/Jewish sharing of authority amounts to a straight up propaganda lie on par with the current “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” slander in post Oct7th Gaza. Britain carpet bombed German cities and civilian populations, the example of Dresden which had no strategic value prove this condemnation of hypocrisy.

   Hamas initiated the Oct7th invasion. It rejects the Oslo Accords wherein PM Sharon made a unilateral withdraw from Gaza. It openly initiated conflicts with Israel once it won the general election and cast the PA out of Gaza. The propaganda lie that “debates” in Oxford the so-called “proposition” – Israel never sought peace with Arabs another bald faced lie. The Wikipedia revisionist history which declares Hamas rejected “the Quartets’ conditions of nonviolence, recognition of Israel, and acceptance of prior agreements” utter narishkeit. The Olso Accords negotiated outside the UN. Post the Nakba Allah defeat in another Arab war to exterminate the Jews, proven by the massacre of Oct7th 2023, the UN has no seat in the Board of Peace as also excluded Britain and France and Russia.

   Claims made by SA of ‘genocide’ rich! SA sits at the tip of Africa! Its black Apartheid reputation a ‘Turd Reich’ of political opportunism on par with Arafat’s Palestinians really the descendants of Greek Boat People later called Philistines. Yishmael in general and Arabs in particular do not originate from Europe any more than Palestine an Arab name or the ICC has jurisdiction of the Palestinian State in Gaza! The UN has a long revisionist history of anti-Israel block-headed voting. UN GA 3379 an infamous disgrace which the current British Green Party has embraced as their flag in their homosexual relationship with the current Socialist government sitting in London.

   ‘Ethnic Cleansing’ and ‘genocide’, an emotion arousing slander on par with the blood libel slanders which resulted in Jewish communities destroyed! Attempts to pigion hole history of nations into some BC/AC bible narishkeit an utter abomination. International Law does not begin and end with the establishment of the UN. Traditional diplomatic historians argue that the Balfour Declaration represents a formal recognition of the historic, indigenous rights of the Jewish people to national self-determination in their ancestral homeland, fulfilling a profound moral and political commitment.

   The Oct7th War initiated by the Hamas/UNWRA alliance which invaded Israel, a war in self-defense. Attempts by hostile states such as within the gossip society represented by the UN nothing short of a denial of Israel’s rights to self-defense. The British invasion of Saddam’s Iraq in conjunction with the Neo-Con Chaney\Bush lies concerning WMD when Iraq connection with 9/11 prove that nations who go to war – they and they alone determine their self-defense strategies – especially after Bush campaigned on a commitment of “No Nation Building”. The October 7, 2023 assault—rests on core principles of national sovereignty and international law.

   The historical pattern wherein European ape-like governments minimize Zionist leadership(s) repeated acceptance to compromise proposals for partition and peace—starting with the 1937 Peel Commission, the 1947 UN Partition Plan, post-1967 land-for-peace frameworks, and the 2000 Camp David/2008 Olmert offers—while Arab leadership systematically rejected them, preferring absolute denial of Jewish sovereignty over compromise – the Jewish people remember and fundamentally refuse to forget.

   Revisionist history compares to Holocaust Denial wherein European project their guilt by calling Israel an Nazi State. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. European attempts to restore the Roman decree of Syria-Palestine post the Bar Kochba defeat amount to European imperialism and attempts to dominate the balance of power which the Nakba Allah Oct 7th War Hamas defeat has radically changes with both the UN and Britain and France excluded from the Trump Gaza peace. Breaking News … Britain and France ceased being ‘great powers’ after they ran away from the Suez attempt in ’56.

   Europe has no shame nor loyalty when viewed under the lenses of complex geopolitical conflicts wherein European leaders make appeals to domestic mobs, such as the Green Party in England who wave the flag of ‘Zionism is Racism’. The European grasshopper/locust “genetic” mental insanity – whenever they throw an ally under the bus they flatten multi-dimensional realities into two dimensional box declarations of condemnations which arouses the mobs into hysteria – like as seen in Universities across Europe and the US – which has disgraced their good name reputations as places of objective ‘Higher Learning’.

   Actual human history simply not a record of times, places, and events. For example: Who killed President Kennedy? Was 9/11 a False Flag attack to invade Iraq and dominate the balance of power in the Middle East which prioritized the domination “New World Order” of the Western democracies over the break up of the USSR?

   The ruse wherein Arabs rejected the 1947 UN Partition Plan which granted 55% of the land to the Jewish State ignore the fact that the Palestine mandate originally awarded to Britain included Trans-Jordan which reflects multiple Byzantine designations of post Bar Kochba Roman Syria-Palestine, akin to the British two state solution which exploded in multiple Indian “civil wars” with Pakistan! Together with the post WWII division of Korea and Vietnam and the “genocide” of Algerians by France.

   Great power politics has never attempted to establish a Independent Kurdistan post WWI despite the collapse of the Ottoman empire and the removal of the Turkish Capital from Istanbul! Had Russia not collapsed, replace by Bolshevik revolutionaries,  cold, calculated realpolitik would have awarded a restored Constantinople to the Czar of Russia.

   The disgraced UN Chairman’s attempt to declare the existence of “Two national movements claiming the same land”, this revisionist history ignores the 1964 PLO Charter which only referred to ’48 Israel as “Occupied Territory”. And the cold hard fact that never in all recorded human history has their ever existed an Arab Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its Capital and having an Independent national currency – as do all nation states.

   This underscores the retroactive UN fabrication of “West Bank” nonsense which hides Judea/Samaria. Throughout the Ottoman period and the British Mandate, the region was officially and commonly referred to in administrative, legal, and biblical contexts as Judea and Samaria. Stripping the territory of its thousands of years of recorded Jewish history and connection, international bodies and opponents of Israel could more easily frame the area as “foreign” or “occupied” land belonging exclusively to another sovereign entity, rather than the heartland of ancestral Jewish heritage.

   Furthermore the revisionist history “prohibition of acquiring territory by war”, ignores the forced mass population transfers of Germans from Prussia and the division of Prussia between Poland and Russia. The choice of words in international diplomacy – never neutral; it actively shapes legal claims, historical memory, and the political reality on the ground. Post War Germany lost 25% of its land. History simply not a moral scoreboard or tribal contest; but rather a record of choices, alliances, and consequences that evolve with evidence, not ideology.

   LikeLike

   Reply
5. 

   The Hoosac historian

   October 7, 2026

   Israel no more created than the US created. LOL”

   I do not know what you are getting at.

   Thank you for the response, I do not follow politics I can’t keep with your political knowledge. Can you limit question to the Bible or theology ,sorry !

   LikeLike

   Reply
   1. 

      moshe kerr

      October 9, 2026

      A myopic senior European diplomat warned that Israel is “isolated and alone,” facing a potential “tsunami of sanctions” if current policies continue, with several nations recalling ambassadors and restricting diplomatic access.  Blind Man’s Bluff, the Israeli victories across the Middle East has radically changed the ‘balance of power’ across this region at the loss to European strategic interests!

      This anonymous EU Official opposes Israeli settlement expansion and ignores the Ham-ass and His-bullah defeats, the collapse of Assad, and most definitely the America First Foreign Policy which now dominates Oil-trade across the world. International alliances have radically changed post the Oct 7th Abomination War. European Governments attempt to provoke a crisis in relations just prior to Israeli national elections and Congressional Mid-term elections, not simply attempts to “challenge” the New Status-Quo in the Middle East and North Africa. Alas for Western Europe EU – no partner in that alliance qualifies as a ‘Great Power’.

      Attempts to justify the clash of interests between shifting alliances, specifically the slow dismantling of the UN due to its bribed block voting evil eye toward the Jewish state, coupled with the prospect that multiple Arab and Muslim countries joining the Abraham Accords. Equally clear, EU strategic pro-Arab anti-Israel interests would suffer a rabid insanity if Israel imposed a forced population transfer of all Gazans to Syria and Iraq. Should Israel do such a policy clearly the EU-Israel Association Agreement, specifically Article 2: respect for human rights has radically changed since the Oct 7th massacre. Post Shoah Israel rejects the Nazi-like Moral superiority of European diplomacy. Democracy not the same thing as a Republic of 12 Tribal States. Israeli self-determination/Zionism\ views with great favor the establishment of the Yichus of the Tribe of Reuven affixed to the territory of Gaza – based upon the premise established by the Romans post the Bar Kochba slaughter – to the victor goes the spoils.

      Israel did not fight and win TWO National Independence Wars – one in 1948 and again in 1967, for hostile European courtrooms to pretend they have the right to judge Israelis post Shoah. The same applies to the UN. Israel did not throw off the yoke of Chamberlains’ moral depravity White Paper, to be dictated where Jews can work and live in Judea & Samaria. Zionism which prioritize Yovel liberty for the 12 tribal Republic defines Israeli self-determination. Restoration of the Written Torah as the Constitution of this Republic mandates lateral Sanhedrin common law courts commanded with משנה תורה-Legislative Review over the established Yichus of the 12 Tribes which the Great Sanhedrin designates. Jews born in a specific tribal land take the Yichus of that Tribe.

      Europeans post Shoah know that their JeZeus God – dead. Just as Arabs and Muslims approach this dawn of awareness once Israel makes a forced population transfer of Nakba Allah Gazans from Israel. Nations have interests and attempts to appeal to the equally dead UN Charter, compares to water flowing off the back of a duck. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, apart from narrow, temporary evacuation circumstances; ignores that some 25% of Germanic Prussia awarded as spoils of war to Poland and Russia. The Shoah did not come as an unheard of shock. In Herzl’s day French antisemitism sought to exclude Jews as citizens of France! The fall of the Byzantine empire killed the earlier post Bar Kachba western empires’ attempt to blot out the memory of the Jewish people from off the oath sworn lands. Arabs in Israel cannot even pronounce the European word Palestine! Perhaps the bard Bob Dylan said it best: “The times they are a’change’n”; or the #1 Hit from the Monkey’s – “We’re the young generations and we have something to say.”

      The forced population transfer of almost 1 million Jews which started in Iraq in 1941 neither “orderly nor humane”. The reality of forced population transfers defines human history. Slavery qualifies as a forced population transfer! Life or Death ultimatums to convert resulted in forced population transfers. The lie of the United Nations as the dawn of a new day amount to total bull shit. The Dreyfus Affair disgraced French antisemites and their attempt to negate Jewish citizenship in France collapsed. Hitler picked up the fallen baton and permanently exposed the Av tumah avoda zara the inherited from generation to generation evil eye toward Jews.

      Bottom line an Independent Republic of 12 Tribes who know Yovel liberty by means of Sanhedrin courts who make fair restitution of damages inflicted by yichus members intra & inter-tribal defines the Torah constitution of justice: צדק צדק תרדוף. An no outside “authority” can say boo otherwise. The internal affairs of Israel’s self determined Republic of Tribes – none of their business nor concern. Herein defines how post the Oct 7th Abomination War as radically changed the balance of power across the Middle East and North Africa.

      Traditionally when the strategic national interests of one nation clash with other nations wars ensue. The French revolution overthrew the Monarchy system of government not only in France but across Europe. The Magna Carta challenged and repudiated “over time” the premise of Divine Right of Kings. So too and how much more so the re-establishment of the Torah Constitutional Tribal Republic post the Oct 7th Abomination War.

      Prior to the unification of Italy late in the 19th Century, Italian City-State diplomacy shaped how nations conducted international through alliances. But even before that chiddush by Italian City-States all Israeli Republics conducted their Foreign Relations by cutting alliances. The term ברית means alliance NOT covenant. All kings of both Yechuda and Israel either through wisdom or folly cut alliances with foreign governments as did Avram Yitzak and Yaacov in their lifetimes as told in the בראשית aggadah. Therefore War and Treaty alliances cut between allies and or defeated peoples – the Assyrian king made a forced population transfer of the elite taken from the conquered kingdom of Samaria-Israel. Herein this T’NaCH mussar instructs the model of how the Zionist Republic shall conduct its strategic Foreign Affairs.

      Both the NT and Koran translate ברית as meaning covenant because both promoted as their primary agenda belief-system theologies/dogma with prioritized the religion of JeZeus as God, or Allah as the One tawhid Universal God. But the confusion starts with the Apostle Paul, his writings preceded the Gospels! His declaration “not under the law” together with “original sin of Adam” compares to how Natan of Gaza served as the “prophet” of Sabbatai Zevi.

      The NT uses the Greek diathēkē. The flaw of reliance upon strategic terms by means of substitution of translations as Primary Sources, in this case the Septuagint – this compares to making a chain wherein a person whispers @#$ into the ear of a person and he does the same with the next etc., down stream the meaning changes. Translations qualify as sophomoric scholarship, PhD scholars rely upon Primary Original Sources. For example: “not under the law” fails to differentiate T’NaCH/Talmudic judicial common law from Roman Senate statute laws; the two legal systems radically different one from the other.

      Jews returning from Babylonian g’lut spoke Aramaic. Hence the Aramaic Targum – there exist several – takes priority over the Septuagint. For the simple reason that Aramaic, as in the targum Onkelos something like a 95% word for word translation. Septuagint Greek culturallly far more alien and distant. For example: מלאכה vs. עבודה the Greek translation fails to distinguish. The categorically prior argument collapses with the Order of the letters of Paul to the 4 gospels. Same holds true with which came first the chicken or the egg false presumptions. Onkelos a convert known to rabbi Yechuda – the author of the Mishna. His Targum respected by the Reshonim scholars whereas the Septuagint the church embraced.

      LikeLike

      Reply
   2. 

      moshe kerr

      October 11, 2026

      A States’-Rights Reading of American History

      Libertarian / states’-rights reading of American history: A real tradition of thought, not a fringe one: Calhoun, the 1896 Populists, Rothbard, and Ron Paul all walk some version of this road. Madison in Federalist 10 defines a pure democracy as a society of few citizens governing themselves directly, and says such democracies “have ever exhibited spectacles of turbulence and contention.” The word Democracy appears essentially nowhere in the Declaration or Constitution; “republic” the operative term (Art. IV §4 guarantees each state a republican form of government). Washington, Adams, and others used “democracy” pejoratively. The Bill of Rights – written against concentrated power, and the original design had Senators chosen by state legislatures, specifically so the Senate represented states as governments, not populations.

      1913 really, a hinge year: Federal Reserve Act, 16th Amendment (income tax), 17th Amendment (direct election). Deflation after 1865 genuinely crushed debtors — farmers especially — the direct ancestor William Jennings Bryan’s “Cross of Gold” speech. Jefferson in Paris when Madison drafted the Bill of Rights. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) already read “among the several states” expansively, and Justice Marshall, not a states’-rights theorist as Madison & Jefferson. The Commerce Clause – partly written because interstate tariffs under the Articles effectively strangled trade. The Interstate Commerce Act aimed at the Robber Barons – weakly. Akin to how Teddy Roosevelt’s anti-trust law, by means of a logical inference, “permitted” the Government to “establish” government approved monopolies such as the 3rd Central Bank and later the Military Industrial Complex. Bottom line: before 1913 the federal government had no direct grab on individual income and no permanent bureaucratic revenue apparatus; after, it did.

      The Interstate Commerce Act aimed at the Robber Barons – akin to how Teddy’s anti-trust laws “permitted” the Government – by the above mentioned logical inference – to “establish” government approved monopolies such as the 3rd Central Bank and later the Military Industrial Complex. Madison argued in Federalist 62 – the Senate a body of the states-as-governments, per the Connecticut Compromise. The 17th Amendment genuinely removed the original intent of the Framer of the Constitution. The Supreme Court should rule that amendment compares directly to Prohibition and the later invalidation of Roe vs. Wade.

      The States of the Union forged a Republic. The word “democracy” so emphasized and adored post Civil War, never once employed in the Declaration of Independence nor either the first or second Constitutions of the United States. The Declaration refers to government deriving its powers from “the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution begins “We the People.” A clear interpretation — based upon the bill of Rights in contrast to the 1789 French Rights of Man prioritizes citizens over the rights of feudal lords. Napoleon needed soldiers, hence he included even Jews as citizens.

      The influence of 17th and 18th Century philosophers interpreted distinctly different by two completely different cultures and societies of revolutionary America vs revolutionary France. Akin to the original NT Greek manuscripts – “total blindness” to the fundamental distinctions between מלאכה vs. עבודה in shabbat observance. The former a Torah wisdom which dictates prophetic mussar as the k’vanna/intent required by all wisdom-time oriented Av commandments such as in the specific shabbat commandment. The latter static and fixed limited to concrete actions rather than internal matters of the heart.

      The Declaration refers to government deriving its powers from “the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution begins “We the People.” A clear interpretation — based upon the bill of Rights in stark contrast with the 1789 French Rights of Man: The latter, explicitly universal and anti-feudal, abolishing Caste system – privilege by feudal ownership of estates together with their serfs; whereas the former frames the Republic’s relationship between the States vs the Central Government. Issue of individual liberty not emphasized based upon the limited voting franchise restricted to land owning men. The Framers of the Constitution lived on the cusp of the Industrial Revolution. Virtually all agricultural based economies throughout human history have required cheap labor, due to farming being labor intensive. Pre-Lincoln’s War, Senator Calhoun retrojection defended the institution of Southern slavery.

      However, ‘the hand writing on the wall’, obvious to all who had eyes that see. Czarist Russia after the 1856 Crimean War defeat, reached the identical conclusion, that for Russia to remain a ‘Great Power’ it too had to follow the examples set by England, France and Germany and the United States. Contrast the Crimean War with the 1956 Suez Canal Crisis where both Britain and France ceased as ‘Great Powers’, due to their diminished industrial capacities when compared to the bi-polar super-powers, which pitted the US against the USSR.

      The Commerce Clause together with the 10th Amendment served as the vision of freedom for the States of the Republic to manage and regulate through “State(s) Rights” all intra-State trade and commerce. Likewise, the other 9 Amendments of the Bill of Rights too policed the Federal and State governments from political “over-reach” by setting limits on the new federal government which now established an additional Executive Branch, which the Articles did not mandate.

      This second Constitution gave Congress power to [bureaucratically] regulate inter-State commerce. Post Lincolns’ War restoration of the Republic, both Parties in Congress passed the Inter-State Commerce Act. Madison\Jefferson’s Bill of Rights clearly feared a strong “king-like” Executive Branch that it, along with the other two mandated branches of the Government might abuse their powers and authority such as “divine right of kings” or Big Brother carpet bagger bureaucrats which defined Czarist Autacracy and post Lincoln’s War America. The contrast of the 2nd US Constitution to the later French Revolution which witnessed the rise of Napoleon – a clear rejection of democracy – proved the fears of the Bill of Rights as meritorious.

      While the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 had bi-partisan support in Congress, it came AFTER the Radical Republicans restricted Lincolns’ ‘Greenback’ fiat money by some 25%. This economic stupidity concentrated wealth and effectively contributed to the rise of the ‘Robber-Barons’, whose monopolies, starting with the railroads, would shape post Civil War America.

      The Citizens United political expression recognizes corporate rights to spend on political speech, while the SAVE America Act, generally speaking – seeks stricter eligibility and identification requirements for citizens voters, based upon the premise that the Bill of Rights most essentially serve to protect citizens of America rather than peoples’ who enter the country illegally. Peoples living in other lands come under the laws of those lands not the laws of America. Just as American citizens their rights to vote in other democratic national elections equally restricted. Citizens United recognizes the 1st Amendment as inclusive of certain corporate political spending. The Save America Act stated aim – tighter citizenship-documentation and voter-ID requirements

      Mitt Romney said “Corporations are people, my friend” at the Iowa State Fair on August 11, 2011, during his campaign for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. He based this response upon Citizens United v. FEC (2010). Candidates elected receive huge “donations” which defines the corruption of “democracy” over defeated Confederate States-Rights. The 17th Amendment to stripped State legislators from appointing Senators to Washington combined with the 1937 expansive Commerce Clause reading, set the stage for the SC Roe vs Wade ruling.

      NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) the Court pivots from “Direct” to “indirect” effects. Before 1937, the Court (the Lochner era Court) held that manufacturing and production were local activities, strictly outside Congress’s power. Only the actual exchange of goods across state lines was “interstate commerce.” The National Labor Relations Board ordered Jones & Laughlin Steel to stop unfair labor practices. Steel argued that labor relations were local manufacturing, not interstate commerce. If the effect on interstate commerce is indirect, Congress cannot regulate it; based upon the Schechter Poultry and Carter v. Carter Coal Co. precedent. In 1937 the Court shifted the test from “Is the activity itself commerce?” to “Does the activity substantially affect commerce?” The consequences of this ruling: Labor relations, wages, and hours—previously off-limits—now federalized because they exist as “burdens on” commerce.

      United States v. Darby (1941) overturned the Hammer v. Dagenhart and Cementing the “Substantial Effect” Test. In Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), the Court had struck down a federal ban on child labor goods, distinguishing between the “evil” (child labor) and the “goods” (commerce). It said Congress couldn’t regulate local labor conditions just because the resulting goods moved across state lines. In 1941 the Court unanimously overruled Hammer v. Dagenhart. Justice Stone (who had dissented in Hammer) wrote that the power to regulate commerce “is the power to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed.” Darby kicked the hinges off the 10th Amendment. The Court declared that Congress can exercise its commerce power to prohibit the movement of any article in interstate commerce that it deems harmful to the public welfare; federal bureaucratic regulation of local production standards (wages/hours), fully constitutional because regulating the goods shipped interstate implicitly regulated the labor that made them.

      Wickard v. Filburn (1942) – the final nail into the coffin. If Darby federalized labor, Wickard federalized everything, including pure self-consumption, this in-effect buried “local” non-commercial distinctions. Roscoe Filburn grew wheat on his own farm in Ohio, exceeding his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act. The excess wheat he fed to his own poultry and used for his own family’s consumption – purely local, non-commercial activity. Justice Jackson wrote that even if Filburn’s activity is local and not commercial, if it is economic in nature, and if the aggregate of such activities by thousands of farmers substantially affects the supply and price of wheat in interstate commerce, then Congress can regulate it. The distinction between “interstate” and “intrastate” commerce, and between “production” and “commerce,” was erased. Almost any human activity with an economic dimension became subject to federal control.

      This undercuts the framers intention to establish Constitutional checks and balances to shape the 3 mandated branches of Government and their priority relationship with the States of the Republic. The post WWII National Debt primarily reflected caused by the Federal Government became the largest employer of Americans than private industry.

      Therefore the 20th Century revolving door between bureaucracies and Corporate monopolies – a clear incest abomination. Madison argued in Federalist 62, which describes the Senate a body of the states-as-governments, per the Connecticut Compromise. The 17th Amendment genuinely removed the original intent of the Framer of the Constitution and like Roe vs Wade the Supreme Court should weigh this Amendment on par with the Prohibition Amendment.

      Post Civil War, about $44 million in greenbacks withdrawn before Congress ended the Contraction Act’s redemption program in February 1868. The Public Credit Act of 1869, a separate later measure concerning repayment of Civil War bondholders The later Specie Resumption Act of 1875 set redemption in gold for 1879 and renewed the contraction debate. Compare this policy of “economic stupidity” to the Federally established monopoly which determine the interest charged on money by all banking institutions; the Fed under FDR it likewise duplicated the same “economic stupidity” post collapse of Wall Street in 1929, Hoover’s depression.

      This “dog returns to eat its own vomit” error effectively contributed to the negation of the Homestead Act of 1862, corporate monopolies acquisition of properties who paid pennies on the dollar for the bankrupted farm lands. Described aptly in the story: “The Grapes of Wrath”. This novel portrays the horrors suffered by tenant farmers driven from Oklahoma by drought and foreclosures; & their exploitation and the harsh conditions these “refugees” endured in California. A virtual replay of Andrew Jackson’s trail of tears – karma has its consequences.

      That same year Wilson radically changed the US experiment and abandoned the advice by the Founding Fathers wherein he duplicated European Central Banking monopoly traditions, that same year the Federal Government abandon tariffs as the main tool to raise money in favor of taxation through the bureaucracy of the IRS\16th Amendment, and passage of the 17th Amendment which stripped the Constitutional power mandated to the States to send Senators as “ministers of the States” to Washington.

      This Amendment ignored the warning issued in the Federalist Papers that democracy requires an educated public. State legislators watched their appointed Senators whom they sent to Washington with the “educated eyes” of a predatory hawk; the general public more bread and potatoes reactionary in nature. Hence election of Representative every two years while Senators every 6 years. The general election of Senators has aroused the call for term limits; perhaps a Senators too should stand for election no different from Representatives.

      While the Feds Board of Governors a federal agency appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, once in power the Fed operates independent from Government over-view no different than most regulatory laws the eyes of Congress never debate. J.P. Morgan & Co. made huge loans to England and France; in 1917 the Fed extended roughly $2.3 billion in credits to the Allies. When Wilson declared war on Germany, the threat of the consequences of declaring war upon England and France stood as the darkest shadow – that both countries would negate their obligations to pay the loans, like as did the Bolshevik Russia after they seized power.

      J.P. Morgan died in 1913. None the less his banking interests greatly influenced the 1910 Jekyll Island planning meeting for the establishment of the 3rd Central Bank; a group including Senator Nelson Aldrich and prominent financiers drafted the banking-reform Aldrich Plan that influenced the later Federal Reserve. John Jacob Astor IV opposed the Aldrich Plan, his tragic death on the Titanic compares to the damned Yankees winning the Civil War in scope; as did passage of the 17th Amendment in 1913.

      The land consolidation and mechanization, initiated by FDR’s socialist policies driven by tractor economics and later USDA production policy committed Washington to pay huge farming subsidies to the “Industrial Revolution” of farming industries.

      LikeLike

      Reply
   3. 

      moshe kerr

      October 12, 2026

      Tom Marvolo Riddle … the Riddle being “I am Lord Voldemort” as an anagram of his name. The blood and body of the false messiah Voldemort — called Horcruxes vs. Harry Potter rose from the dead: the real UN\/Messiah.
      Thank you J. K. Rowling for clarifying the intent of the new testament.

      LikeLike

      Reply
6. 

   The Hoosac historian

   October 12, 2026

   “Tom Marvolo Riddle … the Riddle being “I am Lord Voldemort” as an anagram of his name. The blood and body of the false messiah Voldemort — called Horcruxes vs. Harry Potter rose from the dead: the real UN\/Messiah.
   Thank you J. K. Rowling for clarifying the intent of the new testament.”

   The occult and England is not new and JK Rowling is in a long history. George Pickingale who was a leader of the cunning folk of Victorian England who brought the Wiccan traditions of pre-Christian England back to popularity. Who inspired the likes of Alistair Crowley who inspired L Ron Hubbard who invested scientology. Of course famously how Jimmy Page bought Boleskine house on Loch Ness and got rid of it after it burned down a couple times and scared to death with ghosts all the guests he let stay there. I’d stay clear of Rowling

   LikeLike

   Reply
   1. 

      moshe kerr

      October 19, 2026

      Shabbat a wisdom-time oriented Av commandment … as opposed to a secondary positive or negative toldot/secondary\precedent commandment which does not require k’vanna. 

      This separation between Primary נגד secondary Torah commandments the NT and Koran totally ignore.  The NT originally written in Greek and that foreign tongue represents a radically different culture custom paradigm akin to the incongruity wherein the church made their Sunday as their sabbath and the mosque did the same but different incompatibility declaring the 6th day of the week as their Jumuʿah Mubārakah! 

      Torah Jews in exile “converted” into a religion but Torah when the 12 Tribes originally accepted the revelation – a Written Constitution which mandates Sanhedrin common law federal coourts with the power of legislative review over any statute law imposed by Tribal head/governments.The idea of tawhid Monotheism which the Koran “prophet” promotes (totally at discord) with the 2nd Sinai commandment akin to the Koran declaration that Avraham bound Yishmael at the Akedah.  The Greek NT likewise failed to grasp the subtle distinction which differentiate witchcraft from prophesy.  Bil’aam the “prophet” foretold the future as did the Book of Daniel.  However Daniel excluded, in the Hebrew T’NaCH from the category of “NaCH/prophets”.  Just as Shabbat first introduced in the Aggadic creation story does not mean 7th Day as the Protestant Adventists insist but rather “Week”.  Granted that exiled Jewry “converted” shabbat into the last day of the week.  Nonetheless every Friday “evening” observant Jews make kiddush which separates מלאכה as forbidden from עבודה permitted work. 

      The Greek NT makes no such subtle distinctions.  Not with Shabbat nor with the abstract term prophet.  For example: the Book of Daniel excluded from the NaCH\prophets because both he and Bil’aam – both mystics rather than prophets.  This fine splitting of hairs nuance under-standing known in later Talmudic legalism as pilpul … understanding the difference between like from like.  An example being t’rumah, ma’asar, and chol; a Torah tax imposed upon crops which separates the Cohonim from the Leviim who have no Tribal land-bound Yichus but like all other of the 12 Tribal lands of the Republic their “Yichus” – being the 3 son of Yaacov – determined through the father rather than the mother. The NT Hercules story – that son of God – as no Yichus to any of the sons of Yaacov.

      This type of discernment the Torah refers to as רב חסד whereas the Aramaic in the Talmud repeatedly asks מאי נפקא מינא?  What’s the distinction?  The Siddur affixs this wisdom skill to the blessing: which distinguishes between the 3 possible spirit types called tequiah, tru’ah and sh’varim which discern between the Ya’tzir Ha-Tov tohor spirits within the heart from the Ya’tzir Ha-Rah tumah spirits also in the heart by discerning not only the distinction between tohor vs tumah spirits but more physically fundamental the wind blown from the lungs necessary to blow the shofar at all on יום הזכרון – Rosh HaShanna.

      The B’HaG ruled that the ‘Aliyah’ of Av wisdom-time oriented commandments applied to rabbinic mitzvot elevates them to commandments from the Torah. Hence he ruled, as did Rashi, that visiting sick a mitzva from the Torah because it learns from the precedent of lighting the lights of both shabbat and Hanukkah – possible to raise both rabbinic mitzvot unto tohor wisdom-time oriented commandments by means of prophetic mussar as their k’vanna.

      So besides shabbat and prophet being distinct from Sunday for Xtians and Friday for Muslims and prophet distinct from mystics such as both Bil’aam and Daniel represent, so too and how much more so the pilpul separates t’shuva from repentance based upon the Torah precedent (Torah court room law a common law legal system as opposed to and by Tribal statute laws; the Book of דברים also known as משנה תורה means “Common law”.), for t’shuva being separation from blood vs blood. The blood of the goat cast off the cliff as opposed to the blood of the goat sprinkled before the פרכת which separates the Holy of Holies from the Holy place in the Mishkan. Hence the connection between יום הזכרון to יום הכיפורים.

      A forth example of distinction: The logic which defines how to study and learn both T’NaCH and Talmud/Midrashim and Siddur, a dynamic inductive reasoning which compare or contrasts similar items – akin to the two sights of a rifle which permits a sniper to shoot long distances down range. By stark contrast the lights of Hanukkah commemorate/remember the dedication made within the borders of the Independent Maccabee state free from the Syrian Greek empire to only learn the T’NaCH and Sanhedrin common law legalism by Case/Rule precedent comparison to similar courtroom precedent rulings; this reasoning defines fluid inductive reasoning as opposed to Greek static syllogism deductive logic which both Plato and Aristotle Greek philosophy promotes.

      The kavanah falsely translated as “INTENT”. The latter fails the jurisdictional bridge that pulls secondary toldot commandment/mitzvot unto primary Av wisdom-time oriented commandments which ספר בראשית opens by introducing as its Central Theme “Wisdom-time Oriented Commandments” as taught through the Prime example of Shabbat תמיד מעשה בראשית – repeated twice as emphasis in the opening blessing drabbanon of שחרית תפילה דאורייתא קריא שמע. The Rambam interest criticized the B’HaG for repeatedly promoting rabbinic mitzvot as Torah commandments but failed to discern, at least according to the RambaN’s critique made on his positive 5th commandment ספר המצוות, the subtle distinction between tefillah from tefillah – kre’a shma from shemone esrei. Akin to how mesechta ברכות debates the separation between the blessing vs the actual Torah language of kre’a shma – which constitute as the mitzva from the Torah?

      Kavanah … the vector that pulls the Toldot mitzvot unto the Av commandments. This k’vanna vector absolute distinction which separates Rabbinic mitzvot as secondary to Deoraita commandments as sealed through a static reading of the Written Torah – the fundamental error made by the Rambam’s book of commandments and his Yad statute law halachic code. By ignoring this vector, the Rambam “seals” the Written Torah, turning it into a frozen statute code of law akin to the Code of Hammurabi he Babylonianized … Greek/Romanized it into assimilated statute law which stands upon the flawed logic of making an appeal based upon authority. This basic Constitutional error defines British common law wherein the Parliamentary law defines the Constitution of Great Britain and no British court can thereafter challenge any law passed by Parliament.

      Long before the rise of the British Parliament as dominant over the King, English lords began to reject the false notion of divine right of king John through the Magna Carta 1215! Placed in context of France history – a compare & contrast between the similarities and differences between the two societies duplicates משנה תורה\common law! In 1242 the French king burned all Talmudic manuscripts within the borders of the kingdom at Paris. Whereas the king of England made a forced population transfer of all Jews from Great Britian in 1290, which the French did not do the same until 1306. The common denominator of tyrannical governments – both imposed taxation without representation upon the Jews under their domains like as did king George III upon Americans.

      The Rambam’s Yad (completed c. 1180) just before a train of catastrophes. Based upon the בנין אב precedent of the 2nd Sinai commandment, interpreted by both Moshe and NaCH prophets through the toldot commandments do not follow the ways customs or mannerism of the peoples of either Egypt or Canaan; do not intermarry with with foreign women of Midian and Ezra’s – Shomronim. In a tragic irony, Rambam’s attempt to “protect” the law by sealing it, actually prepared the ground for its destruction; his assimilation to foreign cultures shattered the “Ethical Containment Force” the opening p’sukim describe the Creation story in בראשית.

      By removing the Kavanah Vector, Rambam made the Torah appear like a static statute book—exactly what the French King and the Inquisition knew how to burn or torture unto submission. A living Constitution with a functioning court system far harder to abrogate than a frozen code. Like as did Czar Alexander II Emancipation (1861) decree; when he like Lincoln freed the peasants from their lords who served Czarist autocracy as its constitutional pillar.

      Prior to the 1905 revolution the peasants condemned their Aristocratic land stealing lords, like Arabs since 1948. (Unlike Western feudalism the Czar feared his Aristocrats so he moved them from domain to domain within the vast borders of mother Russia.) But after the Czar ordered his guards to massacre peasant protesters – this act – akin to Oct 7th 2023, pulled the blindfold from off the eyes of the peasants. The central pillar of Czarist autocracy stood upon the feudal aristocracy. The consequence of this action too “shattered the ethical containment force” of Czarist Russia whose anarchy expressed through repeated revolutions.

      LikeLike

      Reply
   2. 

      moshe kerr

      October 22, 2026

      The father determines Tribal Yichus not the mother. Your NT forgery God has no Tribal Yichus because Yosef simply not his father. Based upon the prayer of JeZeus – Our Father who dwells in Heaven etc Zeus has no Tribal Yichus. Hence Harry Potter has as much or more merit than does the NT JeZeus! Because neither fictional character has any Yichus.

      That’s check-mate. :)))

      LikeLike

      Reply
      1. 

         The Hoosac historian

         October 23, 2026

         He was God in flesh but had to be born of a woman and Miryam had the Yikhus

         LikeLike
      2. 

         moshe kerr

         October 23, 2026

         Howdy Hoosac historian :))

         Yichus the mother does not determine. LOL Ya can’t change Torah common law established by Moshe Rabbeinu himself.

         LikeLike
7. 

   The Hoosac historian

   October 19, 2026

   Long response, is there a more precise question or point?

   LikeLike

   Reply
8. 

   The Hoosac historian

   October 23, 2026

   “Howdy Hoosac historian :))

   Yichus the mother does not determine. LOL Ya can’t change Torah common law established by Moshe Rabbeinu himself.”

   Howdy, I can’t but God can by divine miracle, that is a miracle a divine acts that defies science or normal human or even scriptural logic. Are you going to deny the miracle at yan suf or that Moshe talked with Hashem at har Sinai. The birth of Mashiach was miraculous!

   LikeLike

   Reply